The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimizing GCV/GML Scores with Multiple Smoothing Parameters via the Newton Method
Abstract
The (modified) Newton method is adapted to optimize generalized cross validation (GCV) and generalized maximum likelihood (GML) scores with multiple smoothing parameters. The main concerns in solving the optimization problem are the speed and the reliability of the algorithm, as well as the invariance of the algorithm under transformations under which the problem itself is invariant. The proposed algorithm is believed to be highly efficient for the problem, though it is still rather expensive for large data sets, since its operational counts are $(2/3)kn^3 + O(n^2 )$, with k the number of smoothing parameters and n the number of observations. Sensible procedures for computing good starting values are also proposed, which should help in keeping the execution load to the minimum possible. The algorithm is implemented in Rkpack [RKPACK and its applications: Fitting smoothing spline models, Tech. Report 857, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1989] and illustrated by examples of fitting additive and interaction spline models. It is noted that the algorithm can also be applied to the maximum likelihood (ML) and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of the variance component models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Self-citationMaximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
Harville, D. A. (1977) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1977.10480998 · Cited by 2,667
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (2019) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975604 · Cited by 1,737 · cited 4×
“The criteria are modifications of the suggestions by Gill et al. [8, pp. 306-307].”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
Nonparametric regression using Bayesian variable selection
Smith, M., & Kohn, R. (1996) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(95)01763-1 · Cited by 580
Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models
Wood, S. N., Pya, N., & Säfken, B. (2016) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3405673 · Cited by 489
Polynomial splines and their tensor products in extended linear modeling: 1994 Wald memorial lecture
Stone, C. J., Hansen, M. H., Kooperberg, C., & Truong, Y. K. (1997) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1031594728 · Cited by 397
Regularization in the Selection of Radial Basis Function Centers
Orr, M. J. L. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.3.606 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, C., & Wahba, G.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 383-398
- ISSN
- 0196-5204 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-3417
- OpenAlex
- W2164086668
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimizing GCV/GML Scores with Multiple Smoothing Parameters via the Newton Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0912021
- The paper
- Gu, C., & Wahba, G. (1991). Minimizing GCV/GML Scores with Multiple Smoothing Parameters via the Newton Method. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0912021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.