Cited by 2,667Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical and numerical algorithmsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems

Harville, David A.·1977·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Recent developments promise to increase greatly the popularity of maximum likelihood (ml) as a technique for estimating variance components. Patterson and Thompson (1971) proposed a restricted maximum likelihood (reml) approach which takes into account the loss in degrees of freedom resulting from estimating fixed effects. Miller (1973) developed a satisfactory asymptotic theory for ml estimators of variance components. There are many iterative algorithms that can be considered for computing the ml or reml estimates. The computations on each iteration of these algorithms are those associated with computing estimates of fixed and random effects for given values of the variance components.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1977.10480998

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ReML objective function and the variational energy are formally identical under this model.

    “It is interesting to note that the ReML objective function and the variational energy are formally identical under this model [15],[18].”

    From Hierarchical Models in the Brain (2008) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Static cases of the fixed-form scheme reduce to expectation maximisation (EM) and restricted maximum likelihood (ReML) for linear models.

    “We have discussed static cases of this fixed-form scheme previously and how it reduces to expectation maximisation (EM; [17]) and restricted maximum likelihood (ReML; [18]) for linear models [15].”

    From Hierarchical Models in the Brain (2008) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harville, D. A.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Harville, David A.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1977-06
Volume
72
Issue
358
Pages
320-338
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W1982585616
Cited by
2,667
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 109
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
variance component estimation, maximum likelihood estimation, restricted maximum likelihood, fixed and random effects, iterative methods, asymptotic theory, mixed models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review