The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardinal Spline Interpolation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smooth Pycnophylactic Interpolation for Geographical Regions
Tobler, W. R. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481647 · Cited by 678
A Review of Geometric Transformations for Nonrigid Body Registration
Holden, M. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.904691 · Cited by 369
Multi-Model Long Short-Term Memory Network for Gait Recognition Using Window-Based Data Segment
Tran, L., Hoang, T., Nguyen, T., Kim, H., & Choi, D. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3056880 · Cited by 90
UWB signal processing: Projection, B-splines, and modified Gegenbauer bases
Casey, S. D., & Cohl, H. S. (2015) · 2015 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA) · doi:10.1109/sampta.2015.7148840 · Cited by 7
Sampling architectures for ultra-wideband signals
Casey, S. D., & Cohl, H. S. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA) · doi:10.1109/sampta.2017.8024452 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenberg, I. J.
- Venue
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks
- Published
- 1973-01
- OpenAlex
- W4210426676
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardinal Spline Interpolation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1.9781611970555
- The paper
- Schoenberg, I. J. (1973). Cardinal Spline Interpolation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
