Nonlinear Control Under Nonconstant Delays
Abstract
The authors have developed a methodology for control of nonlinear systems in the presence of long delays, with large and rapid variation in the actuation or sensing path, or in the presence of long delays affecting the internal state of a system. In addition to control synthesis, they introduce tools to quantify the performance and the robustness properties of the designs provided in the book. The book is based on the concept of predictor feedback and infinite-dimensional backstepping transformation for linear systems and the authors guide the reader from the basic ideas of the concept - with constant delays only on the input - all the way through to nonlinear systems with state-dependent delays on the input as well as on system states. Several examples are presented that help the reader digest some of the intricacies in the methodology. Readers will find the book useful because the authors provide elegant and systematic treatments of long-standing problems in delay systems, such as systems with state-dependent delays that arise in many applications. In addition, the authors give all control designs by explicit formulae, making the book especially useful for engineers who have faced delay-related challenges and are concerned with actual implementations and they accompany all control designs with Lyapunov-based analysis for establishing stability and performance guarantees. Audience: This book is intended for researchers working on control of delay systems, including engineers…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simultaneous compensation of long input delays and quantization effects in nonlinear systems is a problem of theoretical and practical significance that has not been addressed before.
“Thus, simultaneous compensation of long input delays and quantization effects in nonlinear systems is a problem of theoretical and practical significance, which has not been, heretofore, addressed.”
From Semiglobal Switched Predictor-Feedback Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems With Input Delay and State/Input Quantization (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Safety-Critical Control With Input Delay in Dynamic Environment
Molnar, T. G., Kiss, A. K., Ames, A. D., & Orosz, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2022.3227451 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Delay-Adaptive Control of a 7-DOF Robot Manipulator: Design and Experiments
Bertino, A., Naseradinmousavi, P., & Krstic, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2022.3152363 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationOutput regulation for general heterodirectional linear hyperbolic PDEs coupled with nonlinear ODEs
Irscheid, A., Deutscher, J., Gehring, N., & Rudolph, J. (2023) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110748 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Inexact predictor feedback for multi-input nonlinear systems with distinct input delays
Fang, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111399 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Neural Operators for Predictor Feedback Control of Nonlinear Delay Systems
Bhan, L., Qin, P., Krstic, M., & Shi, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18964 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationBhan, L., Krstic, M., & Shi, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.26443
“However, in nonlinear systems, implementation remains challenging because the predictor is defined by an implicit ordinary differential equation [16].”
Self-citationKoudohode, F., & Bekiaris-Liberis, N. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2026.3730335
Self-citationLi, T., Shang, P., & Diagne, M. (2026) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2026.113282
Sampling-Horizon Neural Operator Predictors for Nonlinear Control Under Delayed Inputs
Bhan, L., Quawas, P., Krstic, M., & Shi, Y. (2026) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2026.3698435
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bekiaris-Liberis, N., & Krstic, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of California at San Diego
- Venue
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks
- Published
- 2013-09-25
- OpenAlex
- W2400848186
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
- Keywords
- nonlinear control, time-varying delays, state-dependent delay, predictor feedback, distributed delay, input delay, state delay, Lyapunov stability, forward completeness, input-output stability, nonlinear systems, linear systems, automotive catalysts, stability analysis, performance guarantees, Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, time-delay systems, distributed parameter systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review