Cited by 2Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationStability and Controllability of Differential Equations

Inexact predictor feedback for multi-input nonlinear systems with distinct input delays

Fang, Qin, Zhang, Zhengqiang·2024·Automatica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111399

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Fang, Q., & Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
Qufu Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Zhengqiang
Venue
Automatica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
159
Pages
111399
ISSN
0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388581139
Cited by
2
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Automatica (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province
  • Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62373214)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021ZD13)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Keywords
predictor feedback, multi-input nonlinear systems, time-delay systems, exponential stability, Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional, backstepping transformation, prediction horizon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review