Cited by 25Machine Learning and Data ClassificationRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Predictive Learning in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Limited

Karpatne, Anuj, Khandelwal, Ankush, Boriah, Shyam, Kumar, Vipin·2014·Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

A large number of real-world domains possess heterogeneity in their data, which implies that different partitions of the data show different relationships between explanatory and response variables. This increases the overall model complexity of predictive learning in the presence of heterogeneity. Additionally, a number of real-world domains lack sufficient training data, making the learning algorithm prone to over-fitting, especially when the model complexity is large. However, there often exists a structure among the data instances and their partitions which can be appropriately leveraged for reducing the model complexity along with addressing heterogeneity. In this paper, we present a framework for learning robust predictive models in real-world heterogeneous datasets which lack sufficient number of training samples. We demonstrate the usefulness of our framework in the domain of remote sensing for forest cover estimation. Through a series of comparative experiments with baseline approaches, we are able to show that our framework: (a) captures meaningful information about heterogeneity in the data, (b) improves prediction performance by addressing data heterogeneity, (c) is robust to over-fitting in the presence of limited training data, and (d) is robust to the choice of the number of partitions used for representing heterogeneity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1.9781611973440.29

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent work, the presence of heterogeneity due to varying vegetation types was inferred by clustering vegetation time series, which was then used to induce similarity in model parameters at related vegetation types.

    “In recent work [67], the presence of heterogeneity due to varying vegetation types was first inferred by clustering vegetation time series, which was then used to induce similarity in the model parameters at related vegetation types.”
  • This resulted in an MTL formulation where the task structure was inferred using contextual variables obtained using domain knowledge.

    “This resulted in an MTL formulation where the task structure was inferred using contextual variables, obtained using domain knowledge.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karpatne, A., Khandelwal, A., Boriah, S., & Kumar, V.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
Published
2014-04-28
Pages
253-261
OpenAlex
W2498607333
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Keywords
data heterogeneity, limited training data, overfitting, predictive modeling, model reduction, forest cover estimation, remote sensing, robust prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review