Predictive Learning in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Limited
Abstract
A large number of real-world domains possess heterogeneity in their data, which implies that different partitions of the data show different relationships between explanatory and response variables. This increases the overall model complexity of predictive learning in the presence of heterogeneity. Additionally, a number of real-world domains lack sufficient training data, making the learning algorithm prone to over-fitting, especially when the model complexity is large. However, there often exists a structure among the data instances and their partitions which can be appropriately leveraged for reducing the model complexity along with addressing heterogeneity. In this paper, we present a framework for learning robust predictive models in real-world heterogeneous datasets which lack sufficient number of training samples. We demonstrate the usefulness of our framework in the domain of remote sensing for forest cover estimation. Through a series of comparative experiments with baseline approaches, we are able to show that our framework: (a) captures meaningful information about heterogeneity in the data, (b) improves prediction performance by addressing data heterogeneity, (c) is robust to over-fitting in the presence of limited training data, and (d) is robust to the choice of the number of partitions used for representing heterogeneity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In recent work, the presence of heterogeneity due to varying vegetation types was inferred by clustering vegetation time series, which was then used to induce similarity in model parameters at related vegetation types.
“In recent work [67], the presence of heterogeneity due to varying vegetation types was first inferred by clustering vegetation time series, which was then used to induce similarity in the model parameters at related vegetation types.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [67]
This resulted in an MTL formulation where the task structure was inferred using contextual variables obtained using domain knowledge.
“This resulted in an MTL formulation where the task structure was inferred using contextual variables, obtained using domain knowledge.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Learning to Localize Objects with Structured Output Regression
Blaschko, M. B., & Lampert, C. H. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_2 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., & Kumar, V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2720168 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Karpatne, A., Khandelwal, A., Boriah, S., & Kumar, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
- Published
- 2014-04-28
- Pages
- 253-261
- OpenAlex
- W2498607333
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Minnesota
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
- Keywords
- data heterogeneity, limited training data, overfitting, predictive modeling, model reduction, forest cover estimation, remote sensing, robust prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review