Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mortality Implications of Mortality Plateaus

Missov, Trifon I., Vaupel, James W.·2015·SIAM Review

Abstract

This article aims to describe in a unified framework all plateau-generating random effects models in terms of (i) plausible distributions for the hazard (baseline mortality) and the random effect (unobserved heterogeneity, frailty) as well as (ii) the impact of frailty on the baseline hazard. Mortality plateaus result from multiplicative (proportional) and additive hazards, but not from accelerated failure time models. Frailty can have any distribution with regularly-varying-at-0 density and the distribution of frailty among survivors to each subsequent age converges to a gamma distribution. In a multiplicative setting the baseline cumulative hazard can be represented as the inverse of the negative logarithm of any completely monotone function. If the plateau is reached, the only meaningful solution at the plateau is provided by the gamma-Gompertz model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/130912992

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elegant Gamma-Gompertz distributions for deaths arise naturally in the framework.

    “and elegant Gamma-Gompertz distributions for deaths arise naturally in the framework (21–24).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.2307/2340011 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0022172400006987 · DOI
  3. Beard R., 1959, MA, 302
  4. 10.2307/2061224 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gampe J., Chap., 3, 219
  6. 10.2307/2061852 · DOI
  7. J. W. Vaupel and B. Jeune, eds. Exceptional Longevity: From Prehistory to the Present , Odense University Press, Odense, Denmark, 1995.
  8. J. W. Vaupel and B. Jeune, eds. Validation of Exceptional Longevity , Odense University Press, Odense, Denmark, 1999.
  9. 10.1126/science.1411541 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0531-5565(93)90048-I · DOI
  11. Fukui H. H., 1993, Experimental Gerontology, 36, 517
  12. 10.1016/0531-5565(95)00013-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0047-6374(98)00102-X · DOI
  14. 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0217 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/08898480500452117 · DOI · Paper page
  16. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Vol. II, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971.
  17. 10.1239/aap/1143936149 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/biomet/asm013 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/2937115 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/589453 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/1530761 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0047-6374(94)90094-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.132.3418.14 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1073/pnas.261228098 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.10.007 · DOI
  27. 10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0445:AVBMRS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.tpb.2009.05.004 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10544 · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1739 · DOI
  31. 10.1073/pnas.71.12.4645 · DOI
  32. 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.22 · DOI
  33. 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.26 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF02592679 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.8503016 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/2297364 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Missov, T. I., & Vaupel, J. W.
Venue
SIAM Review
Published
2015-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
61-70
ISSN
  • 0036-1445
  • 1095-7200
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review