Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eigenvector-Based Centrality Measures for Temporal Networks

Open access
Taylor, Dane, Myers, Sean A., Clauset, Aaron, Porter, Mason A., Mucha, Peter J.·2017·Multiscale Modeling & Simulation

Abstract

Numerous centrality measures have been developed to quantify the importances of nodes in time-independent networks, and many of them can be expressed as the leading eigenvector of some matrix. With the increasing availability of network data that changes in time, it is important to extend such eigenvector-based centrality measures to time-dependent networks. In this paper, we introduce a principled generalization of network centrality measures that is valid for any eigenvector-based centrality. We consider a temporal network with $N$ nodes as a sequence of $T$ layers that describe the network during different time windows, and we couple centrality matrices for the layers into a supracentrality matrix of size $NT\times NT$ whose dominant eigenvector gives the centrality of each node $i$ at each time $t$. We refer to this eigenvector and its components as a joint centrality, as it reflects the importances of both the node $i$ and the time layer $t$. We also introduce the concepts of marginal and conditional centralities, which facilitate the study of centrality trajectories over time. We find that the strength of coupling between layers is important for determining multiscale properties of centrality, such as localization phenomena and the time scale of centrality changes. In the strong-coupling regime, we derive expressions for time-averaged centralities, which are given by the zeroth-order terms of a singular perturbation expansion. We also study first-order terms to obtain first-order-mover scores, which concisely describe the magnitude of the nodes' centrality changes over time. As examples, we apply our method to three empirical temporal networks: the United States Ph.D. exchange in mathematics, costarring relationships among top-billed actors during the Golden Age of Hollywood, and citations of decisions from the United States Supreme Court.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/16m1066142

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, D., Myers, S. A., Clauset, A., Porter, M. A., & Mucha, P. J.
Venue
Multiscale Modeling & Simulation
Published
2017-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
537-574
ISSN
  • 1540-3459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-3467
OpenAlex
W790319228
Cited by
207
References
9
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eigenvector-Based Centrality Measures for Temporal Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/16m1066142
The paper
Taylor, D., Myers, S. A., Clauset, A., Porter, M. A., & Mucha, P. J. (2017). Eigenvector-Based Centrality Measures for Temporal Networks. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1137/16m1066142

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.