The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Convolutional Framelets: A General Deep Learning Framework for Inverse Problems
Open accessAbstract
Recently, deep learning approaches with various network architectures have achieved significant performance improvement over existing iterative reconstruction methods in various imaging problems. However, it is still unclear why these deep learning architectures work for specific inverse problems. Moreover, in contrast to the usual evolution of signal processing theory around the classical theories, the link between deep learning and the classical signal processing approaches, such as wavelets, nonlocal processing, and compressed sensing, are not yet well understood. To address these issues, here we show that the long-sought missing link is the convolution framelets for representing a signal by convolving local and nonlocal bases. The convolution framelets were originally developed to generalize the theory of low-rank Hankel matrix approaches for inverse problems, and this paper further extends this idea so as to obtain a deep neural network using multilayer convolution framelets with perfect reconstruction (PR) under rectified linear unit (ReLU) nonlinearity. Our analysis also shows that the popular deep network components such as residual blocks, redundant filter channels, and concatenated ReLU (CReLU) do indeed help to achieve PR, while the pooling and unpooling layers should be augmented with high-pass branches to meet the PR condition. Moreover, by changing the number of filter channels and bias, we can control the shrinkage behaviors of the neural network. This discovery reveals the limitations of many existing deep learning architectures for inverse problems, and leads us to propose a novel theory for a deep convolutional framelet neural network. Using numerical experiments with various inverse problems, we demonstrate that our deep convolutional framelets network shows consistent improvement over existing deep architectures. This discovery suggests that the success of deep learning stems not from a magical black box, but rather from the power of a novel signal representation using a nonlocal basis combined with a data-driven local basis, which is indeed a natural extension of classical signal processing theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
A Non-Local Algorithm for Image Denoising
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J.-M. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.38 · Cited by 7,616
Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpainting
Pathak, D., Krahenbuhl, P., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Efros, A. A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.278 · Cited by 5,691
Ahmed, N., Natarajan, T., & Rao, K. R. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/t-c.1974.223784 · Cited by 5,156
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03530 · Cited by 2,838
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529 · cited 7×
“For example, in image denoising [40, 76] or streaking artifact problems [28, 35], a residual network works better, since the artifacts are random and have complicated distribution.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 · Cited by 1,995
Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning
Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R., & Rosen, M. S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25988 · Cited by 1,694
Cited by
Deep Learning on Image Denoising: An overview
Tian, C., Fei, L., Zheng, W., Xu, Y., Zuo, W., & Lin, C.-W. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 · Cited by 1,091
Multi-level Wavelet-CNN for Image Restoration
Liu, P., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Lin, L., & Zuo, W. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00121 · Cited by 933
On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Survey
Fan, F.-L., Xiong, J., Li, M., & Wang, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences · doi:10.1109/trpms.2021.3066428 · Cited by 561
Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z · Cited by 531
Self-citationDeep Convolutional Framelet Denosing for Low-Dose CT via Wavelet Residual Network
Kang, E., Chang, W., Yoo, J., & Ye, J. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2823756 · Cited by 336
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, J. C., Han, Y., & Cha, E.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 991-1048
- ISSN
- 1936-4954 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2777802649
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Convolutional Framelets: A General Deep Learning Framework for Inverse Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/17m1141771
- The paper
- Ye, J. C., Han, Y., & Cha, E. (2018). Deep Convolutional Framelets: A General Deep Learning Framework for Inverse Problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1137/17m1141771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.