The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equations
Open accessAbstract
We developed a new class of physics-informed generative adversarial networks (PI-GANs) to solve forward, inverse, and mixed stochastic problems in a unified manner based on a limited number of scattered measurements. Unlike standard GANs relying solely on data for training, here we encoded into the architecture of GANs the governing physical laws in the form of stochastic differential equations (SDEs) using automatic differentiation. In particular, we applied Wasserstein GANs with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) for its enhanced stability compared to vanilla GANs. We first tested WGAN-GP in approximating Gaussian processes of different correlation lengths based on data realizations collected from simultaneous reads at sparsely placed sensors. We obtained good approximation of the generated stochastic processes to the target ones even if there is a mismatch between the input noise dimensionality and the effective dimensionality of the target stochastic processes. We also studied the overfitting issue for both the discriminator and the generator, and we found that overfitting occurs also in the generator in addition to the discriminator as previously reported. Subsequently, we considered the solution of elliptic SDEs requiring approximations of three stochastic processes, namely the solution, the forcing, and the diffusion coefficient. Here again, we assumed data collected from simultaneous reads at a limited number of sensors for the multiple stochastic processes. Three generators were used for the PI-GANs: two of them were feed forward deep neural networks (DNNs), while the other one was the neural network induced by the SDE. For the case where we have one group of data, we employed one feed forward DNN as the discriminator, while for the case of multiple groups of data we employed multiple discriminators in PI-GANs. We solved forward, inverse, and mixed problems without changing the framework of PI-GANs, obtaining both the means and the standard deviations of the stochastic solution and the diffusion coefficient in good agreement with benchmarks. In this work, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of PI-GANs in solving SDEs for about 120 dimensions. In principle, PI-GANs could tackle very high dimensional problems given more sensor data with low-polynomial growth in computational cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517384113 · Cited by 4,796
Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data
Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165893 · Cited by 2,890
Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations
Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., & Fotiadis, D. I. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.712178 · Cited by 2,412
DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations
Sirignano, J., & Spiliopoulos, K. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.029 · Cited by 2,208
Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective
Stuart, A. M. (2010) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492910000061 · Cited by 1,791
Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations
Raissi, M., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.039 · Cited by 1,349
Self-citationZhu, Y., & Zabaras, N. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018 · Cited by 704
Machine learning of linear differential equations using Gaussian processes
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2017) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.050 · Cited by 584
Self-citation
Cited by
Physics-informed machine learning
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · Cited by 8,718
Self-citationZhang, D., Lu, L., Guo, L., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.07.048 · Cited by 513
Self-citationUnderstanding Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Techniques, Applications, Trends, and Challenges
Farea, A., Yli-Harja, O., & Emmert-Streib, F. (2024) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai5030074 · Cited by 259
Outlook for Exploiting Artificial Intelligence in the Earth and Environmental Sciences
Boukabara, S.-A., Krasnopolsky, V., Penny, S. G., Stewart, J. Q., McGovern, A., Hall, D., Ten Hoeve, J. E., Hickey, J., Allen Huang, H.-L., Williams, J. K., et al. (2021) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-20-0031.1 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, L., Zhang, D., & Karniadakis, G. E.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- A292-A317
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W3004450693
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 22.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/18m1225409
- The paper
- Yang, L., Zhang, D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2020). Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/18m1225409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.