Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 552

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices II: Computing a Low-Rank Approximation to a Matrix

Drineas, Petros, Kannan, Ravi, Mahoney, Michael W.·2006·SIAM Journal on Computing

Abstract

In many applications, the data consist of (or may be naturally formulated as) an $m \times n$ matrix A. It is often of interest to find a low-rank approximation to A, i.e., an approximation D to the matrix A of rank not greater than a specified rank k, where k is much smaller than m and n. Methods such as the singular value decomposition (SVD) may be used to find an approximation to A which is the best in a well-defined sense. These methods require memory and time which are superlinear in m and n; for many applications in which the data sets are very large this is prohibitive. Two simple and intuitive algorithms are presented which, when given an $m \times n$ matrix A, compute a description of a low-rank approximation $D^{*}$ to A, and which are qualitatively faster than the SVD. Both algorithms have provable bounds for the error matrix $A-D^{*}$. For any matrix X, let $\|{X}\|_F$ and $\|{X}\|_2$ denote its Frobenius norm and its spectral norm, respectively. In the first algorithm, c columns of A are randomly chosen. If the $m \times c$ matrix C consists of those c columns of A (after appropriate rescaling), then it is shown that from $C^TC$ approximations to the top singular values and corresponding singular vectors may be computed. From the computed singular vectors a description $D^{*}$ of the matrix A may be computed such that $\mathrm{rank}(D^{*}) \le k$ and such that $$ \left\|A-D^{*}\right\|_{\xi}^{2} \le \min_{D:\mathrm{rank}(D)\le k} \left\|A-D\right\|_{\xi}^{2} + poly(k,1/c) \left\|{A}\right\|^2_F $$ holds with high probability for both $\xi = 2,F$. This algorithm may be implemented without storing the matrix A in random access memory (RAM), provided it can make two passes over the matrix stored in external memory and use $O(cm+c^2)$ additional RAM. The second algorithm is similar except that it further approximates the matrix C by randomly sampling r rows of C to form a $r \times c$ matrix W. Thus, it has additional error, but it can be implemented in three passes over the matrix using only constant additional RAM. To achieve an additional error (beyond the best rank k approximation) that is at most $\epsilon\|{A}\|^2_F$, both algorithms take time which is polynomial in k, $1/\epsilon$, and $\log(1/\delta)$, where $\delta>0$ is a failure probability; the first takes time linear in $\mbox{max}(m,n)$ and the second takes time independent of m and n. Our bounds improve previously published results with respect to the rank parameter k for both the Frobenius and spectral norms. In addition, the proofs for the error bounds use a novel method that makes important use of matrix perturbation theory. The probability distribution over columns of A and the rescaling are crucial features of the algorithms which must be chosen judiciously.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/s0097539704442696

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 552

Metadata

Authors
Drineas, P., Kannan, R., & Mahoney, M. W.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Computing
Published
2006-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
158-183
ISSN
  • 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7111
OpenAlex
W1970576574
Cited by
552
References
2
FWCI
21.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices II: Computing a Low-Rank Approximation to a Matrix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/s0097539704442696
The paper
Drineas, P., Kannan, R., & Mahoney, M. W. (2006). Fast Monte Carlo Algorithms for Matrices II: Computing a Low-Rank Approximation to a Matrix. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0097539704442696

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.