The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests effects of air pollution and forest management
Abstract
We compiled regional and continental data on inorganic nitrogen (N) in seepage and surface water from temperate forests. Currently, N concentrations in forest waters are usually well below water quality standards. But elevated concentrations are frequently found in regions with chronic N input from deposition (>810 kg ha1 a1). We synthesized the current understanding of factors controlling N leaching in relation to three primary causes of N cycle disruption: (i) Increased N input (air pollution, fertilization, N 2 fixing plants). In European forests, elevated N deposition explains approximately half of the variability in N leaching, some of the remaining variability could be explained by differences in N availability or "N status". For coniferous forests, needle N content above 1.4% and (or) forest floor C:N ratio lower than 25 were thresholds for elevated nitrate leaching. At adjacent sites conifer forests receive higher N deposition and exhibit higher nitrate loss than deciduous forests; an exception is alder that shows substantial nitrate leaching through N fixation input. Fertilization with N poses limited risk to water quality, when applied to N-limited forests. (ii) Reduced plant uptake (clear-cut, thinning, weed control). The N cycle responses to plant cover disturbance by clear-cut are well studied. Nitrate losses peak after 23 years and are back to pre-cut levels after 35 years. Nitrogen losses increase with deposition and are higher at N rich sites. The extent and duration of the nitrate response is especially connected to the recovery of the vegetation sink. Less intensive disturbances like thinning have only minor effects on N loss. (iii) Enhanced mineralization of soil N (liming, ditching, climate change). Responses in nitrate leaching after liming may increase with N deposition and in older stands. However data on these types of N cycle disruption are too sparse to allow general conclusions on controlling factors. Nitrate leaching occurs when N deposition (input) and net mineralization (N status) exceed plant demand. A combined N flux to the soil of 50 to 60 kg ha1 a1 from N deposition and litterfall may be a threshold for nitrate leaching in undisturbed forests. This threshold also indicates risk of increasing losses in case of a disturbance (e.g., clear-cut). We conclude by discussing forest management options for water quality protection. These options focus on decreasing input, increasing plant uptake, increasing biomass removal, and (re)establishing immobilization and denitrification processes at the catchment scale.Key words: clear-cut, disturbance, forest management, nitrate, nitrogen cycling, nitrogen saturation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., et al. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 · Cited by 5,315
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Foster, D. R., Motzkin, G., & Slater, B. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900008 · Cited by 662
Olsson, B. A., Staaf, H., Lundkvist, H., Bengtsson, J., & Kaj, R. (1996) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(95)03697-0 · Cited by 215
Cited by
The C:N:P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: A review and perspectives
Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., & Peñuelas, J. (2012) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.08.002 · Cited by 685
Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species
Vesterdal, L., Schmidt, I. K., Callesen, I., Nilsson, L. O., & Gundersen, P. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.015 · Cited by 592
Self-citationRhizosphere effect on nutrient availability in soil and its uptake by plants: a review
Dotaniya, M. L., & Meena, V. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40011-013-0297-0 · Cited by 298
Predicting dissolved inorganic nitrogen leaching in European forests using two independent databases
Dise, N. B., Rothwell, J. J., Gauci, V., van der Salm, C., & de Vries, W. (2009) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.003 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Gundersen, P., Schmidt, I. K., & Raulund-Rasmussen, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Reviews
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-57
- ISSN
- 1181-8700 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2014535492
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests effects of air pollution and forest management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/a05-015
- The paper
- Gundersen, P., Schmidt, I. K., & Raulund-Rasmussen, K. (2006). Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests effects of air pollution and forest management. Environmental Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.