Cited by 187Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and Research

Effects of high-intensity interval exercise versus continuous moderate-intensity exercise on postprandial glycemic control assessed by continuous glucose monitoring in obese adults

Little, Jonathan P., Jung, Mary E., Wright, Amy E., Wright, Wendi, Manders, Ralph J.F.·2014·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of acute high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared with continuous moderate-intensity (CMI) exercise on postprandial hyperglycemia in overweight or obese adults. Ten inactive, overweight or obese adults (41 ± 11 yrs, BMI = 36 ± 7 kg/m 2) performed an acute bout of HIIT (10 × 1 min at approximately 90% peak heart rate (HR peak) with 1-min recovery periods) or matched work CMI (30 min at approximately 65% HR peak) in a randomized, counterbalanced fashion. Exercise was performed 2 h after breakfast, and glucose control was assessed by continuous glucose monitoring under standardized dietary conditions over 24 h. Postprandial glucose (PPG) responses to lunch, dinner, and the following day’s breakfast were analyzed and compared with a no-exercise control day. Exercise did not affect the PPG responses to lunch, but performing both HIIT and CMI in the morning significantly reduced the PPG incremental area under the curve (AUC) following dinner when compared with control (HIIT = 110 ± 35, CMI = 125 ± 34, control = 162 ± 46 mmol/L × 2 h, p < 0.05). The PPG AUC (HIIT = 125 ± 53, CMI = 186 ± 55, control = 194 ± 96 mmol/L × 2 h) and the PPG spike (HIIT = Δ2.1 ± 0.9, CMI = Δ3.0 ± 0.9, control = Δ3.0 ± 1.5 mmol/l) following breakfast on the following day were significantly lower following HIIT compared with both CMI and control (p < 0.05). Absolute AUC and absolute glucose spikes were not different between HIIT, CMI, or control for any meal (p > 0.05 for all). We conclude that a single session of HIIT has greater and more lasting effects on reducing incremental PPG when compared with CMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/apnm-2013-0512

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 187

Authors
Little, J. P., Jung, M. E., Wright, A. E., Wright, W., & Manders, R. J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2014-07
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
835-841
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W2109573408
Cited by
187
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
FWCI
39.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dexcom
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity continuous training, postprandial glucose control, postprandial hyperglycemia, obesity, overweight adults, exercise timing, acute exercise effects, continuous glucose monitoring, incremental area under the curve
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Time Factors, Exercise, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review