Incidence of nonresponse and individual patterns of response following sprint interval training
Open accessAbstract
The current study sought to explore the incidence of nonresponders for maximal or submaximal performance following a variety of sprint interval training (SIT) protocols. Data from 63 young adults from 5 previously published studies were utilized in the current analysis. Nonresponders were identified using 2 times the typical error (TE) of measurement for peak oxygen uptake (2 × TE = 1.74 mL/(kg·min)), lactate threshold (2 × TE = 15.7 W), or 500 kcal time-to-completion (TTC; 2 × TE = 306 s) trial. TE was determined on separate groups of participants by calculating the test–retest variance for each outcome. The overall rate of nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake across all participants studied was 22% (14/63) with 4 adverse responders observed. No nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake were observed in studies where participants trained 4 times per week (n = 18), while higher rates were observed in most studies requiring training 3 times per week (30%–50%; n = 45). A nonresponse rate of 44% (8/18) and 50% (11/22) was observed for the TTC test and lactate threshold, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between the changes in peak oxygen uptake and TTC (r = 0.014; p = 0.96) or lactate threshold (r = 0.17; p = 0.44). The current analysis demonstrates a significant incidence of nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake and heterogeneity in the individual patterns of response following SIT. Additionally, these data support the importance of training dose and suggest that the incidence of nonresponse may be mitigated by utilizing the optimal dose of SIT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low responders to each exercise stimulus may be as high as 25% in studies of individuals undertaking resistance and endurance training in isolation.
“The characterisation of individual responses is not a new phenomenon, but the results of studies of individuals undertaking resistance and endurance training in isolation suggest that 'low responders' to each exercise stimulus may be as high as 25% (Timmons et al., 2005;Phillips et al., 2013;Gurd et al., 2016).”
From Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? (2017) · cites this paper as Gurd et al., 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Gurd, B. J., Giles, M. D., Bonafiglia, J. T., Raleigh, J. P., Boyd, J. C., Ma, J. K., Zelt, J. G. E., & Scribbans, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gurd, Brendon J.
- Venue
- Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-234
- ISSN
- 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
- 1715-5320
- OpenAlex
- W1898146007
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
- Keywords
- sprint interval training, peak oxygen uptake, lactate threshold, time to exhaustion, training dose, test-retest variability, cardiorespiratory fitness
- MeSH terms
- High-Intensity Interval Training, Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Oxygen Consumption, Running, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Muscle, Skeletal, Lactic Acid, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review