Cited by 32Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

Hormonal interaction in controlling apical dominance in soybeans

Ali, A., Fletcher, R. A.·1971·Canadian Journal of Botany

Abstract

Growth of cotyledonary buds in soybean plants is controlled by an interaction between hormones and is dependent on age of the plant and meristematic activity of the buds. Indoleacetic acid (IAA) applied to the cut surface of decapitated 7-day-old plants does not inhibit the growth of buds which are actively undergoing mitosis. Growth is inhibited, however, when IAA is applied in combination with benzyl-adenine(BA) and this inhibitory effect is minimized by gibberellic acid (GA). In 16-day-old plants where mitosis in the buds has ceased IAA alone inhibits bud growth. In both 7- and 16-day-old decapitated plants, application of GA, alone or in combination with BA promotes growth of the buds. Inhibited buds have two peroxidase isoenzymes with pronounced activity. The activity of one of these decreases when the buds are released from dominance. Benzyladenine applied directly to inhibited buds initiates growth in 16-day-old intact plants and this growth is further enhanced when GA is applied 48 h after BA treatment. The enhanced growth by GA is prevented if 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FDU) are applied before but not after the GA treatment. These results indicate that the hormones have a sequential role in releasing buds from apical dominance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/b71-243

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies show that applying cytokinin together with auxin to the cut stem of decapitated plants can enhance auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth.

    “These results are consistent with previous studies showing that applying cytokinin together with auxin to the cut stem of decapitated plants can enhance auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth (Ali and Fletcher, 1971;Davies et al., 1966;Hillman, 1970;Phillips, 1969).”

    From The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in <i>Arabidopsis</i> (2000) · cites this paper as Ali and Fletcher, 1971

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, A., & Fletcher, R. A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Botany
Published
1971-09-01
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
1727-1731
ISSN
0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090796490
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
apical dominance, soybean, indole-3-acetic acid, benzyladenine, gibberellic acid, peroxidase isozymes, mitotic activity, meristematic activity, 5-fluorouracil, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine, hormone crosstalk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review