Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

History of late- and post-glacial vegetation and disturbance around Upper South Branch Pond, northern Maine

Anderson, R. Scott, Davis, Ronald B., Miller, Norton G., Stuckenrath, Robert·1986·Canadian Journal of Botany

Abstract

The changing character of vegetation and the effects of disturbance on vegetation are inferred from pollen, plant macrofossils, charcoal, and microlepidopteran larvel head capsules in sediment cores from Upper South Branch Pond, Maine. Following deglaciation 12 500 – 12 000 years ago, a herb–shrub tundra developed which included moss species characteristic of calcareous, mineral soils. Fire and infestation by microlepidopterans were unimportant initially but became important upon arrival of spruce, paper birch, balsam fir, white pine, and tamarack trees (ca. 10 200 – 9500 years BP). Fires were infrequent in the watershed between 7500 and 5000 years BP. The relatively stable forests of this period, dominated by hemlock and yellow birch, grew in what may have been the moistest part of the Holocene. The maximum postglacial abundance of microlepidopteran larvae is centered around the hemlock decline (ca. 4800 years BP). Subsequently, the forest was composed largely of deciduous trees and white pine. Fire incidence was greater, and fewer fossils of microlepidoptera were deposited. Lack of major disturbances between ca. 3300 and 2600 years BP coincided with increases in hemlock, tamarack, yellow birch, and arbor vitae. Increases in boreal conifers began by about 1700 years ago, suggesting cooler, and perhaps wetter, climate. An increase in microlepidoptera accompanied the recent expansion of boreal conifers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/b86-262

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At low and mid-elevations 4850 yr BP, hemlock, a dominant species in the forest, suddenly declined in abundance, apparently because of a pathogen outbreak.

    “At low and mid-elevations 4850 yr BP, hemlock, a dominant species in the forest, suddenly declined in abundance, apparently because of a pathogen outbreak (Davis 1981a, 1983, Allison et al. 1986, Anderson et al. 1986).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, R. S., Davis, R. B., Miller, N. G., & Stuckenrath, R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Botany
Published
1986-09-01
Volume
64
Issue
9
Pages
1977-1986
ISSN
0008-4026
Cited by
85
References
1
Language
fr

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review