The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Degradation of the lignocellulose complex in wood
Abstract
Degradation of the lignocellulose complex in wood varies depending on the microorganism causing decay. The degradative processes of white-, brown-, and soft-rot fungi as well as different forms of bacterial degradation are presented. Ultrastructural methods were used to elucidate cell-wall alterations that occurred during the various stages of decay. In wood inoculated with the white-rot fungus Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, changes in the cell wall, such as electron-dense zones after staining with uranyl acetate, were evident during incipient stages of decay. The ratio of syringyl:guaiacyl lignin of different woods, different cell types, and even the different layers within a cell wall influenced the type and extent of decay by white-rot fungi. Soft rots caused unique changes in the lignocellulose matrix. The type of wood substrate governed the form (type I or type II) of soft rot that occurred. Brown-rot fungi depolymerized cellulose early in the decay process and degraded cellulose without prior removal of lignin. Bacterial degradation was common in waterlogged woods and three forms, tunneling, erosion and cavitation, are discussed. In addition to an improved understanding of decay processes in living trees and forest products, knowledge of decomposition mechanisms is important to utilize effectively these microorganisms for new industrial bioprocessing technologies. Key words: biodegradation, white rot, brown rot, soft rot, bacterial degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
FTIR studies of the changes in wood chemistry following decay by brown-rot and white-rot fungi
Pandey, K. K., & Pitman, A. J. (2003) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/s0964-8305(03)00052-0 · Cited by 1,202
Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution
Janusz, G., Pawlik, A., Sulej, J., Świderska-Burek, U., Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A., & Paszczyński, A. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux049 · Cited by 984
Riley, R., Salamov, A. A., Brown, D. W., Nagy, L. G., Floudas, D., Held, B. W., Levasseur, A., Lombard, V., Morin, E., Otillar, R., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400592111 · Cited by 745
Self-citationHatakka, A. (2001) · Biopolymers Online · doi:10.1002/3527600035.bpol1005 · Cited by 397
Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis
Laiho, R., & Prescott, C. E. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x03-241 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanchette, R. A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1995-12-31
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 999-1010
- ISSN
- 0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084454452
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation of the lignocellulose complex in wood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b95-350
- The paper
- Blanchette, R. A. (1995). Degradation of the lignocellulose complex in wood. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.