Far-red light stimulates internode elongation, cell division, cell elongation, and gibberellin levels in bean
Abstract
The contributions of cell division and cell elongation and the potential role of gibberellins in the far-red light stimulation of bean internode elongation were investigated. When bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Kentucky Wonder, were grown in white light supplemented with far-red light a significant increase, up to threefold, in internode elongation was observed. Microscopic examination revealed that cell lengths were also increased but by a lower magnitude than internode length. Cell-labeling studies with [3H]thymidine showed that nuclei labeling was increased in internodes receiving supplemental far-red light. Thus far-red light induced increased internode elongation is a result of both increased cell elongation and increased cell division. Gibberellins A1, A20, A19, A44, and A4 and kaurenoic acid were identified in extracts of internode tissue by gas chromatography – mass spectroscopy using [2H2]-labeled internal standards for quantification. It thus appears that the early C-13 hydroxylation pathway is operative in the elongating internode. Endogenous GA1 and GA20 were approximately twofold higher in the first internodes of plants receiving supplemental far-red light. A comparison of the metabolism of exogenously supplied [2H2]GA19 suggested that GA turnover was greater in tissues exposed to supplemental far-red light. These results indicate that both cell division and elongation contribute to the enhanced elongation response of bean internodes to far-red light and tha…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GA turnover is higher in tissues exposed to far-red light.
“GA turnover is higher in tissues exposed to far-red light (Beall et al., 1996).”
From Growth, photosynthetic function, and stomatal characteristics of Persian walnut explants in vitro under different light spectra (2023) · cites this paper as Beall et al., 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saeedi, S. A., Vahdati, K., Sarikhani, S., Daylami, S. D., Davarzani, M., Gruda, N. S., & Aliniaeifard, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1292045 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Beall, F. D., Yeung, E. C., & Pharis, R. P.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1996-05-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 743-752
- ISSN
- 0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090926494
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- far-red light, internode elongation, Phaseolus vulgaris, cell division, cell elongation, gibberellin, gibberellin metabolism, gibberellin A1, GA20, GA4, kaurenoic acid, phytochrome, thymidine labeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review