The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation
Abstract
Major metal-binding phases in the aerobic layer of sediments are iron and manganese oxyhydroxides (FeOOH and MnOOH) and particulate organic carbon (POC). The acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) model proposed for predicting nontoxicity from metals-contaminated sediments is only applicable to anaerobic sediments. In other sediments, normalization by POC or FeOOH and MnOOH may be predictive, but binding constants are not well understood. Metal mobilization is enhanced by ligand complexation and oxidation of anaerobic sediments. Free metal ion is the most bioavailable species, but other labile metal species and nonchemical variables also determine metal bioavailability; biotic site binding models have shown promise predicting toxicity for systems of differing chemistry. Hazard identification and ecological risk assessment (ERA) depend on determining bioavailability, from water (overlying, interstitial) and food, which can be done prospectively (e.g., normalized sediment chemistry, laboratory bioassays) or retrospectively (e.g., in situ bioassays, field studies). ERA of sediment-bound metals requires primary emphasis on toxicity and consideration of the three separate transformation processes for metals in the aquatic environment, the differences between essential and nonessential metals, the complex interactions that control bioavailability, adaptation, which may occur relatively simply without appreciable cost to the organism, weight of evidence, and causality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
The chemistry of the hydrogen sulfide and iron sulfide systems in natural waters
MORSE, J., MILLERO, F., CORNWELL, J., & RICKARD, D. (1987) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/0012-8252(87)90046-8 · Cited by 660
Cited by
Eggleton, J., & Thomas, K. V. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.001 · Cited by 1,116
Atkinson, C. A., Jolley, D. F., & Simpson, S. L. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.068 · Cited by 458
Bai, J., Xiao, R., Cui, B., Zhang, K., Wang, Q., Liu, X., Gao, H., & Huang, L. (2011) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.004 · Cited by 435
Trace organic contaminants in urban runoff: associations with urban land-use
Burant, A., Selbig, W., Furlong, E. T., & Higgins, C. P. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.066 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, P. M., Wang, F., Janssen, C., Persoone, G., & Allen, H. E.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2221-2243
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W1995642176
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfas-55-10-2221
- The paper
- Chapman, P. M., Wang, F., Janssen, C., Persoone, G., & Allen, H. E. (1998). Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-55-10-2221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.