Cited by 46Seedling growth and survival studiesGeology and Environmental Impact StudiesBioenergy crop production and management

Growth and survival of seven native willow species on highly disturbed coal mine sites in eastern Canada

Mosseler, A., Major, J.E., Labrecque, M.·2014·Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

Significant differences were apparent in seven native North American willow (Salix) species compared and assessed in common garden field tests for survival, biomass production, and coppice structure on former coal mine sites in New Brunswick, Canada. In most species, percentage survival was relatively constant after the initial establishment phase, allowing good prediction of final survival in the first or second year after establishment. Unrooted dormant stem sections collected from clones of five willow species previously field-tested and selected for survival and growth, survived and grew better on the mine site to be reclaimed than those collected directly from natural populations, demonstrating the ability to rapidly improve survival results based on prior field testing. Survival at ages 5 and 6 improved from an average of 70% to 94% for S. eriocephala Michx. and from 42% to 84% for S. interior Rowlee. The best clones in both species had over 95% survival and had approximately 5–6 t·ha−1 (t = tonne) fresh mass after 2 years of coppice growth. We recommend these two species for use in mine reclamation activities, because they grew best overall and had the highest survival rates. Despite poor average rooting ability in S. bebbiana Sarg., S. discolor Muhl., and S. humilis Marshall, some genotypes of these species showed good survival and growth, and further selection for these traits is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0447

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Riparian varieties have demonstrated superior ability to establish large root systems even on impoverished sites.

    “Riparian varieties, in particular, have demonstrated superior ability to establish large root systems even on impoverished sites (Mosseler et al., 2014).”
  • Previous studies that explored willow production on mine land were used to verify the range of yield values used in this analysis.

    “Previous studies that explored willow production on mine land were used to verify the range of yield values that were used in this analysis. 15,18,21,22”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosseler, A., Major, J. E., & Labrecque, M.
Affiliations
  • Canadian Forest Service (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2014-04
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
340-349
ISSN
  • 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6037
OpenAlex
W1970359279
Cited by
46
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
willow, coal mine reclamation, plant survival, biomass production, clone selection, Salix eriocephala, Salix interior, Salix bebbiana, Salix discolor, Salix humilis, rooting ability, native tree species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review