The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators
Abstract
The distribution of canopy heights obtained with an airborne laser scanner over a field trial with Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) was a function of the vertical distribution of foliage area. Over a wide range of canopy structures, the proportion of laser pulses returned from or above a given reference height was proportional to the fraction of leaf area above it. We hypothesized that the quantile of the laser canopy heights matching in probability the fraction of leaf area above a desired height would be an unbiased estimator of same. This was confirmed in 36 (20 × 20 m) plots and 6 older validation plots. Canopy-based quantiles of the laser canopy height data were within 6% (mean 3%) of the field estimates. Laser and field estimates were strongly correlated (r ~ 0.8), and statistical tests supported the null hypotheses of no difference in mean stand height (P > 0.3). A geometric model successfully predicted the mean difference between the laser canopy heights and the mean tree height. Our results explicate why estimation of stand heights from laser scanner data based on the maximum canopy height value in each cell of a fixed area grid has been successful in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Cited by
Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis
Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Hill, D., Quinn, R., Armstrong, L., & Shreenan, R. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.5589/m03-024 · Cited by 331
Frazer, G. W., Magnussen, S., Wulder, M. A., & Niemann, K. O. (2011) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.008 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Magnussen, S., & Boudewyn, P.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- NRC Research Press
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1016-1031
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056280688
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfr-28-7-1016
- The paper
- Magnussen, S., & Boudewyn, P. (1998). Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-28-7-1016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.