The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis
Abstract
Lidar technology has reached a point where ground and forest canopy elevation models can be produced at high spatial resolution. Individual tree crown isolation and classification methods are developing rapidly for multispectral imagery. Analysis of multispectral imagery, however, does not readily provide tree height information and lidar data alone cannot provide species and health attributes. The combination of lidar and multispectral data at the individual tree level may provide a very useful forest inventory tool. A valley following approach to individual tree isolation was applied to both high resolution digital frame camera imagery and a canopy height model (CHM) created from high-density lidar data over a test site of even aged (55 years old) Douglas-fir plots of varying densities (300, 500, and 725 stems/ha) on the west coast of Canada. Tree height was determined from the laser data within the automated crown delineations. Automated tree isolations of the multispectral imagery achieved 80%‐90% good correspondence with the ground reference tree delineations based on ground data. However, for the more open plot there were serious commission errors (false trees isolated) mostly related to sunlit ground vegetation. These were successfully reduced by applying a height filter to the isolations based on the lidar data. Isolations from the lidar data produced good isolations with few commission errors but poorer crown outline delineations especially for the densest plot. There is a complimentarity in the two data sources that will help in tree isolation. Heights of the automated isolations were consistently underestimated versus ground reference trees with an average error of 1.3 m. Further work is needed to test and develop tools and capabilities, but there is an effective synergy of the two high resolution data sources for providing needed forest inventory information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Acker, S. A., Parker, G. G., Spies, T. A., & Harding, D. (1999) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00052-8 · Cited by 904
Hyyppa, J., Kelle, O., Lehikoinen, M., & Inkinen, M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.921414 · Cited by 752
Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
Persson, Å., Holmgren, J., & Söderman, U. (2002) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · Cited by 713
Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data
Næsset, E. (1997) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(97)83000-6 · Cited by 604
Means, J. (1999) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00091-1 · Cited by 503
Popescu, S. C., Wynne, R. H., & Nelson, R. F. (2002) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s0168-1699(02)00121-7 · Cited by 471
Næsset, E. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00243-7 · Cited by 460
Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators
Magnussen, S., & Boudewyn, P. (1998) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-28-7-1016 · Cited by 430
Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data
Nelson, R., Krabill, W., & Tonelli, J. (1988) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90028-4 · Cited by 400
Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests
Harding, D. J., Lefsky, M. A., Parker, G. G., & Blair, J. B. (2001) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00210-8 · Cited by 400
Cited by
Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Yu, X., Vastaranta, M., Hyyppä, H., Kukko, A., Holopainen, M., Heipke, C., Hirschmugl, M., Morsdorf, F., et al. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4040950 · Cited by 486
Generating pit-free canopy height models from airborne lidar
Khosravipour, A., Skidmore, A. K., Isenburg, M., Wang, T., & Hussin, Y. A. (2014) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.80.9.863 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Hill, D., Quinn, R., Armstrong, L., & Shreenan, R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 633-649
- ISSN
- 0703-8992 (ISSN-L)
- 1712-7971
- OpenAlex
- W2125899407
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5589/m03-024
- The paper
- Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Hill, D., Quinn, R., Armstrong, L., & Shreenan, R. (2003). Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.