Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intestinal parasites of gray wolves (Canis lupus) in northern and western Canada

Schurer, Janna M., Pawlik, Michael, Huber, Anna, Elkin, Brett, Cluff, H. Dean, Pongracz, Jodie D., Gesy, Karen, Wagner, Brent, Dixon, Brent, Merks, Harriet, Bal, Mandeep S., Jenkins, Emily J.·2016·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Gray wolves (Canis lupus L., 1758) are mobile opportunistic predators that can be infected by a wide range of parasites, with many acquired via predator–prey relationships. Historically, many of these parasites were identified only to genus or family, but genetic tools now enable identification of parasite fauna to species and beyond. We examined 191 intestines from wolves harvested for other purposes from regions in the Northwest Territories, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Adult helminths were collected from intestinal contents for morphological and molecular identification, and for a subset of wolves, fecal samples were also analyzed to detect helminth eggs and protozoan (oo)cysts. Using both detection methods, we found that 83% of 191 intestines contained one or more parasite species, including cestodes (Taenia spp., Echinococcus spp., and Diphyllobothrium sp.), nematodes (Uncinaria stenocephala Railliet, 1884, Trichuris spp., Physaloptera spp., and Toxascaris leonina (von Linstow, 1902)), a trematode (Alaria sp.), and protozoa (Sarcocystis spp., Giardia sp., and Cryptosporidium spp.). Molecular characterization identified one species of Diphyllobothrium (Diphyllobothrium latum (L., 1758) Cobbold, 1858), three species of Taenia (Taenia krabbei Moniez, 1879, Taenia hydatigena Pallas, 1766, and Taenia multiceps Leske, 1786), and two Giardia duodenalis (Davaine) Deschiens, 1921 assemblages (B and C). These results demonstrate the diverse diet of wolves and illustrate the possibility of parasite spillover among wildlife, domestic animals, and people.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjz-2016-0017

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumption of carnivore meat can be hazardous to human health due to parasitic infections and the bioaccumulation of toxins.

    “Moreover, not only carnivores have a lower biomass transfer efficiency but also consumption of carnivore meat can be hazardous to human health due to parasitic infections and the bioaccumulation of toxins (35–37).”

    From Pre-Clovis occupation of the Americas identified by human fecal biomarkers in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

    The discussion (draft p. 13) reports zoonotic parasites in wolves and identifies potential risks to human health. It does not say that eating carnivore meat transmits those parasites or address toxin bioaccumulation. The parasitic-health-risk portion is supported, but the claimed consumption route and toxin hazard are not. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00422-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0020-7519(93)90065-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90109-W · DOI
  4. 10.1017/S0031182011002319 · DOI
  5. 10.3201/eid.1810.120119 · DOI
  6. 10.1139/z73-158 · DOI
  7. Craig H.L., 2005, J. Helminthol., 79, 95, 10.1079/JOH2005828 · DOI
  8. 10.1139/z02-149 · DOI
  9. 10.1890/06-1439.1 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00436-013-3371-x · DOI
  11. Gray D.R., 1983, Acta Zool. Fenn., 174, 255
  12. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0137 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1985.tb14142.x · DOI
  14. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407706-5.00002-2 · DOI
  15. Jones, A., and Pybus, M.J. 2001. Taeniasis and echinococcosis. In Parasitic diseases of wild mammals. Edited by W.M. Samuel, M.J. Pybus, and A.A. Kocan. Iowa State University Press, Ames. pp. 150–192. · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1756-3305-1-32 · DOI
  17. 10.7589/0090-3558-48.3.717 · DOI
  18. 10.1674/0003-0031(2000)144[0428:DOEMBM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03458.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.043 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01072-2 · DOI
  22. Peregrine A.S., 2012, Can. Vet. J., 53, 870
  23. 10.2307/1381751 · DOI
  24. Rausch, R.L. 1995. Life-cycle patterns and geographic distribution of Echinococcus species. In Echinococcus and hydatid disease. Edited by R.C.A. Thompson and A.J. Lymbery. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp. 89–134.
  25. 10.3201/eid1401.071113 · DOI
  26. Sallows, T. 2007. Diet preference and parasites of grey wolves in Riding Mountain National Park of Canada. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Environment and Geography, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Available from http://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/handle/1993/8030/Sallows_Diet_preference.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  27. 10.1128/CMR.00033-08 · DOI
  28. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0273 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.02.004 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.008 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/S0031182013001716 · DOI
  32. Skelding A., 2014, Can. Vet. J., 55, 551
  33. 10.7589/0090-3558-47.1.222 · DOI
  34. Thompson R.C.A., 2006, Parasitology, 132, 439, 10.1017/S0031182005009170 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.003 · DOI
  36. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00825.x · DOI
  37. Wang W., 1989, Bull. Endem. Dis., 4, 8
  38. 10.1128/JCM.00445-10 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schurer, J. M., Pawlik, M., Huber, A., Elkin, B., Cluff, H. D., Pongracz, J. D., Gesy, K., Wagner, B., Dixon, B., Merks, H., Bal, M. S., & Jenkins, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.
  • Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, 600, 5102–50th Avenue, Yellowknife, NT X1A 3S8, Canada.
  • Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Inuvik Region, Box 2749, Inuvik, NT X0E 0T0, Canada.
  • Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, P.L. 2204E, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada.
  • Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana 141004, India.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
2016-09
Volume
94
Issue
9
Pages
643-650
ISSN
  • 0008-4301
  • 1480-3283
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review