The DOI matches its Crossref record.
One species with two biologies: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the wild and in aquaculture
Abstract
Today, over 94% of all adult Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) are in the aquaculture niche and wild numbers continue to decline while aquaculture numbers increase. The developmental and evolutionary forces in the aquaculture or "domestic" niche are so unlike those in the wild niche that two distinct biologies are being created from the original Atlantic salmon species. We may now need to recognize a new biological entity - Salmo domesticus - and treat it as an "exotic" when it escapes into the wild. Escapement therefore raises important concerns about ecological and genetic impacts, both within and outside the native range of Salmo salar. This paper explains why escaped domestic Atlantic salmon have had an impact on wild Atlantic salmon populations and now threaten Pacific salmonids as well. A polarization of views between aquaculturists and environmentalists will not resolve the problems. The three interest groups in fisheries - aquaculture, biodiversity, and capture - must begin to work together if we are to take up the challenge of preserving biodiversity and if aquaculturists, who hold the future of Atlantic salmon in their hands, can be expected to willingly prevent further impacts from their industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies.
Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J. H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M. C. M., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H., & Troell, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016500 · Cited by 3,063
Aquaculture--A Gateway for Exotic Species
Naylor, R. L., Williams, S. L., & Strong, D. R. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064875 · Cited by 527
Tidwell, J. H., & Allan, G. L. (2001) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve236 · Cited by 447
Implications of domestication and rearing conditions for the behaviour of cultivated fishes
Huntingford, F. A. (2004) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00562.x · Cited by 438
Responsible Approach to Marine Stock Enhancement: An Update
Lorenzen, K., Leber, K. M., & Blankenship, H. L. (2010) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641262.2010.491564 · Cited by 357
Predators select against high growth rates and risk–taking behaviour in domestic trout populations
Biro, P. A., Abrahams, M. V., Post, J. R., & Parkinson, E. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2861 · Cited by 313
Animal domestication and behavior
(2002) · doi:10.1079/9780851995977.0000 · Cited by 288
Fish behavioral types and their ecological consequences
Mittelbach, G. G., Ballew, N. G., & Kjelvik, M. K. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0558 · Cited by 259
Implications of climate change for the fishes of the British Isles
Graham, C. T., & Harrod, C. (2009) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02180.x · Cited by 247
de Groot, S. J. (2002) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/a:1021038916271 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, M. R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 131-144
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2152017357
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.