Cited by 76Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFossil Insects in Amber

Cranial morphology of Sinornithosaurus millenii Xu et al. 1999 (Dinosauria: Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China

Xu, Xing, Wu, Xiao-Chun·2001·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

The recent discovery of the early dromaeosaurid Sinornithosaurus millenii Xu et al. 1999 is especially important for our understanding of maniraptoran evolution, particularly of avian origins. This paper presents a thorough description of the skull of this species, revises the diagnosis based on cranial features, and discusses similarities to those of other dromaeosaurids and Archaeopteryx. Distinctive cranial characteristics of S. millenii include the presence of a deep excavation on the posteroventral margin of the premaxilla, a diastema between the premaxillary and maxillary teeth, a number of pits and ridges on the anterolateral surface of the antorbital fossa, long posterolateral process of the parietal that are sharply posteriorly directed, the column-like margin of the pterygoid process of the quadrate, the bifurcated posterior end of the dentary, and a distinctive groove posterior to the anterior carina on the lingual surface of the premaxillary tooth crowns. The present study on the skull of S. millenii provides new information on the poorly known cranial anatomy of dromaeosaurid dinosaurs, revealing that dromaeosaurids share more similarities with Archaeopteryx than previously thought. It also provides evidence suggesting that early dromaeosaurids are more bird-like than the later, more derived ones, thus contradicting claims that more bird-like dinosaurs appeared later in fossil record than the earliest birds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e01-082

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less well-developed furrows are present in at least some manual phalanges of Guanlong, Yutyrannus, Sinornithoides, and Sinornithosaurus.

    “Less well-developed furrows are also present in at least some manual phalanges of the basal tyrannosauroids Guanlong (IVPP V14531; OR, pers. obs.) and Yutyrannus (ZCDM V5001 [29]), and the paravians Sinornithoides (IVPP V9612; OR, pers. obs.) and Sinornithosaurus (IVPP V12811 [30]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., & Wu, X.-C.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
1739-1752
ISSN
  • 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3313
OpenAlex
W2092769284
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
Dromaeosauridae, skull morphology, cranial anatomy, Archaeopteryx, avian origin, Yixian Formation, premaxilla, parietal, dentary, dinosaur-bird transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review