Cited by 100Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The oldest Archaeopteryx (Theropoda: Avialiae): a new specimen from the Kimmeridgian/Tithonian boundary of Schamhaupten, Bavaria

Open access
Rauhut, Oliver W.M., Foth, Christian, Tischlinger, Helmut·2018·PeerJ

Abstract

The iconic primeval bird Archaeopteryx was so far mainly known from the Altmühltal Formation (early Tithonian) of Bavaria, southern Germany, with one specimen having been found in the overlying Mörnsheim Formation. A new specimen (the 12th skeletal specimen) from the earliest Tithonian Painten Formation of Schamhaupten (Bavaria) represents the so far oldest representative of the genus. The new specimen shows several interesting anatomical details, including the presence of a postorbital in contact with the jugal, the presence of a separate prefrontal and coronoid, and opisthocoelous mid-cervical vertebrae. Based on observations on the new specimen, we discuss several problematic issues concerning Archaeopteryx , including the monophyly and diagnosis of the genus, the absence/presence of the sternum, the position of the gastralia, and variation in morphometrics and dental morphology in that genus. Based on a new diagnosis for the genus Archaeopteryx , the Berlin, Eichstätt, Solnhofen, Munich, Daiting, Thermopolis, 11th, and 12th specimens can be referred to this genus with high certainty. The Maxberg specimen is very probably also an Archaeopteryx , based on overall similarity, although none of the diagnostic characters can be evaluated with certainty. The ninth specimen (‘chicken wing’) might be Archaeopteryx , but cannot be referred to the genus with any certainty. In comparison with other paravians, the presence of distally thickened anterior pectoral ribs indicates that a rather large cartilagenous sternum was present in this taxon. In contrast to non-opisthopubic theropods, opisthopubic taxa, such as Archaeopteryx and many other paravians, have the posterior end of the gastral basket preserved at about half-length of the pubis, which might reflect the post-mortem collapse of enlarged abdominal air sacs in these taxa. Specimens that can be referred to Archaeopteryx show a high amount of variation, both in the morphometrics of the limb bones as well as in the dentition. In respect to the latter aspect, variation is found in tooth number, spacing, orientation, and morphology, with no two specimens showing the exact same pattern. The significance of this variation is unclear, and possible explanations reach from high intraspecific (and possibly ontogenetic and/or sexual dimorphic) variation to the possibility that the known specimens represent a ‘species flock’ of Archaeopteryx , possibly due to island speciation after the initial dispersal of the genus into the Solnhofen Archipelago.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.4191

Cites

195 of 195 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The structure of metatarsal I suggests the hallux orientation in Archaeopteryx may be slightly more medial than in most anisodactyl neornithines, as is also true of some more derived Cretaceous birds.

    “However, the structure of metatarsal I suggests the orientation of the hallux may be slightly more medial than in most anisodactyl neornithines [2, 13], which is also true of some more derived Cretaceous birds (e.g., Confuciusornis ) [62].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Description > Postcranium section says metatarsal I indicates that Archaeopteryx’s first digit was not parallel to the others and may have been somewhat opposable. It does not compare the hallux’s orientation with that of most anisodactyl neornithines or establish that it was slightly more medial. The separate claim about Cretaceous birds is attached to citation [62], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The teeth of Archaeopteryx are basally bulbous, rapidly tapering in their apical quarter, forming a sharp and slightly recurved tip that closely aligns with the distal margin of the tooth.

    “The teeth are basally bulbous rapidly tapering in their apical quarter forming a sharp and slightly recurved tip that closely aligns with the distal margin of the tooth (often located caudal to the distal margin in hypercarnivorous deinonychosaurs) [13].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Description > Dentition passage says the premaxillary tooth tip turns back in the apical third and lies approximately above the posterior margin of its base, rather than beyond it. But the Discussion > The monophyly of Archaeopteryx describes these teeth as having a straight basal part and a bulbous, recurved apical part—not a bulbous base—and does not specify rapid tapering in the apical quarter. The Discussion > Variation in Archaeopteryx also notes that tooth shapes differ by position and specimen. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The number of teeth is reduced from 14 maxillary and 16 dentary teeth in Anchiornis to 8-10 maxillary and 11-13 dentary teeth in Archaeopteryx.

    “The number of teeth is reduced from 14 maxillary and 16 dentary teeth in Anchiornis , a taxon documented to be at least partially vertivorous [84], to 8-10 maxillary and 11-13 dentary teeth in Archaeopteryx [13, 81].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion’s “Variation in Archaeopteryx” section reports 8–9 maxillary teeth and 11–13 dentary teeth in Archaeopteryx. It supports the dentary range and most of the maxillary range, but not the claimed upper value of 10. The Anchiornis count is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

71 of the 266 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bock WJ Bühler P Archaeopteryx lithographica von Meyer, 1861 (Aves): proposed conservation of usage by designation of a neotype Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 2007 64 182 184
  2. Burnham DA Currie PJ Koppelhus EB Shugar MA Wright JL New information on Bambiraptor feinbergi (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Montana Feathered Dragons. Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds 2004 Bloomington Indiana University Press 67 111
  3. Bühler P Bock W Nomenclature of Archaeopteryx: misunderstandings and solution Journal für Ornithologie 2002 143 269 286
  4. Chiappe LM Ji S-A Ji Q Juvenile birds from the Early Cretaceous of China: implications for the enantionithine ontogeny American Museum Novitates 2007 3594 1 1 46 10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3594[1:jbftec]2.0.co;2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chiappe LM Norell MA Clark JM Chiappe LM Witmer LM The Cretaceous, short-armed Alvarezsauridae. Mononykus and its kin Mesozoic Birds. Above the Heads of Dinosaurs 2002 Berkeley University of California Press 87 120
  6. Colbert EH The Triassic dinosaur Coelophysis Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 1989 57 1 160
  7. Currie PJ Varricchio DJ Currie PJ Koppelhus EB Shugar MA Wright JL A new dromaeosaurid from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canada Feathered Dragons. Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds 2004 Bloomington Indiana University Press 112 132
  8. Elzanowski A Chiappe LM Witmer LM Archaeopterygidae (Upper Jurassic of Germany) Mesozoic Birds. Above the Heads of Dinosaurs 2002 Berkeley University of California Press 129 159
  9. Evers SW The postcranial osteology of a large specimen of Allosaurus “jimmadsoni” (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Late Jurassic of Wyoming, U.S.A MSc Thesis 2014 Munich Ludwig-Maximilians-University 218 pp
  10. Godfrey SJ Currie PJ Currie PJ Koppelhus EB Shugar MA Wright JL A theropod (Dromaeosauridae, Dinosauria) sternal plate from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Campanian, Upper Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canada Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds 2004 Bloomington Indiana University Press 144 149
  11. Hanken J Wake D Freeman H Three new species of minute salamanders (Thorius: Plethodontidae) from Guerrero, Mexico, including the report of a novel dental polymorphism in urodeles Copeia 1999 1999 4 917 931 10.2307/1447967 · DOI
  12. Hendrickx C Araújo R Mateus O The non-avian theropod quadrate I: standardized terminology with an overview of the anatomy and function Peerj 2015a 3 e1245 10.7717/peerj.1245 26401455 PMC4579021 · DOI
  13. Hu Y Wang X Huang J A new species of compsognathid from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China Journal of Geology 2016 40 191 196
  14. Huxley TH On the animals which are most nearly intermediate between birds and reptiles Annals and Magazine of Natural History 1868 4 66 75
  15. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) Archaeopteryx lithographica von Meyer, 1861 (Aves): conservation of usage by designation of a neotype Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 2011 68 230 233
  16. Ji Q Ji SA Lü J You H Chen W Liu Y Liu Y First avialian bird from China (Jinfengopteryx elegans gen. et sp. nov.) Geological Bulletin of China 2005 24 197 210
  17. Kessler E Reif W-E Westphal F Lower Cretaceous birds from Cornet (Roumania) Third Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems, Short Papers 1984 Tübingen Attempto Verlag 119 121
  18. Madsen JH Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey Bulletin 1976 109 3 163
  19. Makovicky PJ Norell MA Weishampel DB Dodson P Osmólska H Troodontidae The Dinosauria 2004 Second Edition Berkeley University of California Press 184 195
  20. Maxwell DW Witmer LM New material of Deinonychus (Dinosauria: Theropoda) Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 1996 16 51A
  21. Norell MA Makovicky PJ Weishampel DB Dodson P Osmólska H Dromaeosauridae The Dinosauria 2004 Second Edition Berkeley University of California Press 196 209
  22. Norell MA Makovicky PJ Clark JM Currie PJ Koppelhus EB Shugar MA Wright JL The braincase of Velociraptor Feathered Dragons Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds 2004 Bloomington, Indianapolis Indiana University Press 133 143
  23. Osmólska H Currie PJ Barsbold R Weishampel DB Dodson P Osmólska H Oviraptorosauria The Dinosauria 2004 Second Edition Berkeley University of California Press 165 183
  24. Ostrom JH Description of the Archaeopteryx specimen in the Teyler Museum, Haarlem Koniklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Proceedings B 1972 75 289 305
  25. Raath MA The anatomy of the Triassic theropod Syntarsus rhodesiensis (Saurischia: Podokesauridae) and a consideration of its biology 1977 PhD thesis Rhodes University
  26. Sereno PC Rao C Li J Chiappe LM Witmer LM Sinornis santensis (Aves: Enantiornithes) from the Early Cretaceous of northeastern China Mesozoic Birds. Above the Heads of Dinosaurs 2002 Berkeley University of California Press 184 208
  27. Weishampel DB Dodson P Osmólska H The Dinosauria 2004 Second Edition Berkeley University of California Press 861
  28. Zhou Z Zhang F A long-tailed, seed-eating bird from the Early Cretaceous of China Nature 2002 418 6896 405 409 10.1038/nature00930 12140555 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rauhut, O. W. M., Foth, C., & Tischlinger, H.
Affiliations
  • Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie (DE)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • Stammham, Germany
Corresponding author
Rauhut, Oliver W.M.
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2018-01-26
Volume
6
Pages
e4191
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785121086
Cited by
100
References
266
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Volkswagen Foundation (No. I/84 640)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Archaeopteryx, Avialae, theropod dinosaurs, Paraves, postorbital, gastralia, sternum, monophyly, genus diagnosis, Solnhofen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review