The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Balanced cross sections
Abstract
Post-depositional concentric deformation produces no significant change in rock volume. Since bed thickness remains constant in concentric deformation, the surface area of a bed and its length in a cross-sectional plane must also remain constant. Under these conditions, a simple test of the geometric validity of a cross section is to measure bed lengths at several horizons between reference lines located on the axial planes of major synclines or other areas of no interbed slip. These bed lengths must be consistent unless a discontinuity, like a décollement, intervenes. Consistency of bed length also requires consistency of shortening, whether by folding and (or) faulting, within one cross section and between adjacent cross sections.The number of possible cross-sectional explanations of a set of data is reduced by the fact that, in a specific geological environment, there is only a limited suite of structures which can exist. This imposes a set of local "ground rules" on interpretation. When these local restrictions are coupled with the geometric restrictions which follow from the law of conservation of volume, it is often possible to produce structural cross sections that have a better-than-normal chance of being right.The concept of consistency of shortening can be extrapolated to a mountain belt as a whole, thereby indicating the necessity for some kind of transfer mechanism wherein waning faults or folds are compensated by waxing en echelon features. These concepts are illustrated diagrammatically and by examples from the Alberta Foothills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G., & Copeland, P. (2006) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b25911.1 · Cited by 299
Bechennec, F., Le Metour, J., Rabu, D., Bourdillon-de-Grissac, C., de Wever, P., Beurrier, M., & Villey, M. (1990) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.1992.049.01.14 · Cited by 162
Chaimov, T. A., Barazangi, M., Al‐Saad, D., Sawaf, T., & Gebran, A. (1990) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/tc009i006p01369 · Cited by 138
A balanced model of the southern Central Andes
Schmitz, M. (1994) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/93tc02232 · Cited by 138
Progressive evolution of thrust fold topography in the frontal Himalaya
Wahyudi, D. R., Sinclair, H. D., & Mudd, S. M. (2021) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107717 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlstrom, C. D. A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1969-08-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 743-757
- ISSN
- 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3313
- OpenAlex
- W2012594522
- Cited by
- 1,164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balanced cross sections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/e69-069
- The paper
- Dahlstrom, C. D. A. (1969). Balanced cross sections. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/e69-069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.