Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tectonic evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in western Nepal: Implications for channel flow models

Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G., Copeland, P.·2006·Geological Society of America Bulletin

Abstract

Research Article| July 01, 2006 Tectonic evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in western Nepal: Implications for channel flow models Delores M. Robinson; Delores M. Robinson 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487 USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Peter G. DeCelles; Peter G. DeCelles 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Peter Copeland Peter Copeland 3Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Delores M. Robinson 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487 USA Peter G. DeCelles 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Peter Copeland 3Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 10 Oct 2005 Revision Received: 11 Jan 2006 Accepted: 05 Feb 2006 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2006) 118 (7-8): 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25911.1 Article history Received: 10 Oct 2005 Revision Received: 11 Jan 2006 Accepted: 05 Feb 2006 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Delores M. Robinson, Peter G. DeCelles, Peter Copeland; Tectonic evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in western Nepal: Implications for channel flow models. GSA Bulletin 2006;; 118 (7-8): 865–885. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25911.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract We present a new geologic map of western Nepal and three balanced regional cross sections in the Himalayan thrust belt. The minimum shortening between the South Tibetan detachment and the Main Frontal thrust is 485–743 km and suggests that total Himalayan shortening may exceed 900 km. All rocks involved in the thrust belt are of upper crustal affinity, implying that a comparable length of Indian lower crust and mantle lithosphere was subducted beneath Tibet. Major structural features are the Subhimalayan thrust system, Lesser Himalayan imbricate zone, Dadeldhura thrust sheet, Lesser Himalayan duplex, Ramgarh thrust sheet, Main Central thrust sheet, and a north-dipping normal-sense shear zone, possibly related to the South Tibetan detachment. These structures are continuous along the entire Nepalese portion of the Himalayan thrust belt. New 40Ar/39Ar ages from the Ramgarh thrust zone, Greater Himalayan rocks, and the lower part of the Tethyan sequence support a kinematic model in which major thrust systems in Nepal propagated southward from early Miocene time onward. The geometry and kinematic history of the thrust belt in western Nepal are not compatible with recent models for southward ductile extrusion of Greater Himalayan rocks in a mid-crustal channel. Instead, the thrust belt in western Nepal behaved like a typical forward propagating thrust system, involving unmetamorphosed, brittlely deformed rocks in its frontal part and ductilely deformed, higher-grade metamorphic rocks in its hinterland region. Although our results do not support published versions of the channel flow model, they provide additional geological and geo-chronological data that will assist future attempts to develop geodynamic models for the Himalayan-Tibetan orogenic system. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/b25911.1

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G., & Copeland, P.
Venue
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Published
2006-06-30
Volume
118
Issue
7-8
Pages
865-885
ISSN
  • 0016-7606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2674
OpenAlex
W2134254813
Cited by
299
References
86
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tectonic evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in western Nepal: Implications for channel flow models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/b25911.1
The paper
Robinson, D. M., DeCelles, P. G., & Copeland, P. (2006). Tectonic evolution of the Himalayan thrust belt in western Nepal: Implications for channel flow models. Geological Society of America Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1130/b25911.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.