Kinematical and rheological evolution of a crustal-scale ductile thrust zone, Central Metasedimentary Belt, Grenville orogen, Ontario
Abstract
The Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone is a 10 km thick, 200+ km long, stack of crystalline thrust sheets, enclosed by an anastomosing network of ductile thrust zones, formed at mid- to deep-crustal depths in the southwest Grenville orogen, Ontario. It has behaved as a coherent upper amphibolite facies thrust zone, accommodating northwestward transport of the Central Metasedimentary Belt, the largest lithotectonic entity in this part of the orogen, by coherent and contemporaneous displacements. The earliest thrusting was well under way by ca. 1.19–1.18 Ga and the boundary thrust zone was reactivated at ca. 1.08–1.05 Ga. The early thrusting records the closure of a back-arc basin within the Central Metasedimentary Belt, which closed at ca. 1.19–1.18 Ga. The younger thrusting may reflect continental collision to the southeast of the exposed Grenville and represent intraplate reactivation of the boundary thrust zone, which acted as an older, crustal-scale zone of weakness. Transverse mid- to deep-crustal thrusting was apparently contemporaneous with longitudinal (orogen-parallel) shearing at higher structural levels. The rheological behaviour of the deforming media may have influenced the localization of both the upper and lower limits of the boundary thrust zone at the time of its initiation. The upper limit coincides with a chain of relatively stiff metagabbro bodies, which may have acted as a barrier to the upward migration of fluids responsible for syntectonic…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hanmer and McEachern (1992) inferred that the metagabbros may have acted as a physical barrier to the upward migration of metasomatic fluids in the Elzevir terrane.
“Hanmer and McEachern (1992) inferred that the metagabbros may have acted as physical barrier to the upward migration of metasomatic fluids in the Elzevir terrane (see Fig. 2).”
From The role of excess oxygen for modeling high-Mn, low-Ca garnets in metapelites from the northern Central Metasedimentary Belt of the Grenville Province, Ontario, Canada (2021) · cites this paper as Hanmer and McEachern (1992)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Hanmer, S., & McEachern, S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1992-08-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1779-1790
- ISSN
- 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3313
- OpenAlex
- W1976648441
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
- Keywords
- Central Metasedimentary Belt, Grenville orogen, back-arc basin closure, continental collision, amphibolite facies, metagabbro, fluid migration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review