The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pre-Grenvillian evolution and Grenvillian overprinting of the Parautochthonous Belt in Key Harbour, Ontario: U–Pb and field constraints
Abstract
The Parautochthonous Belt in the region of Key Harbour, Ontario, is composed of Early Proterozoic migmatitic para- and orthogneiss and Mid-Proterozoic granitoids, which were reworked during the Grenville orogeny. Grenvillian deformation is localized into anastomosing arrays of high-strain shear zones enclosing elongate bands and lozenges of rock subjected to lower and near-coaxial strain. Crosscutting relationships preserved in the low-strain domains document two pre-Grenvillian plutonic and tectonometamorphic events, which are bracketed in age by U–Pb zircon geochronology. A 1694 Ma leucogranite intrudes, and provides a minimum age for, high metamorphic grade gneisses formed during an earlier tectonometamorphic event (D 1–M 1). The leucogranite was intruded by mafic dykes, deformed, and metamorphosed at uppermost amphibolite facies during D 2–M 2, before the emplacement of Mid-Proterozoic granitoids at ca. 1450 Ma. Following the emplacement of gabbro dykes and pods at ca. 1238 Ma, the area was overprinted by granulite to uppermost amphibolite facies metamorphism (Grenvillian), for which monazites provide a minimum age of ca. 1035 Ma. Titanite U–Pb ages of 1003 – 1004 Ma record cooling through 600 °C. A regionally important swarm of east–west-trending posttectonic pegmatite dykes dated by U–Pb zircon at 990 Ma provides a minimum age for Grenvillian ductile deformation. The present data support the contention that the Parautochthonous Belt in the Key Harbour area consists in part of reworked midcontinental crust of Early to Mid-Proterozoic age.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The southern part of the Parautochthonous Belt in Ontario preserves a record of mid- to late-Ottawan ages including ca.1035 Ma in southern Britt domain and 1040-1032 Ma in Tomico domain.
“the southern part of the Parautochthonous Belt in Ontario preserves record of mid-to late-Ottawan ages including ca.1035 Ma in southern Britt domain (U-Pb monazite Corrigan et al. 1994) and 1040-1032 Ma in Tomico domain (U-Pb monazite, LA-ICP-MS; Culshaw et al. 2023)”
From The Grenville Province: revisiting the orogenic framework and integrating recent findings (2025) · cites this paper as Corrigan et al. 1994
Citations
Cites
Zolnai, A. I., Price, R. A., & Helmstaedt, H. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/e84-048 · Cited by 90
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Culshaw, N. G., Jamieson, R. A., Ketchum, J. W. F., Wodicka, N., Corrigan, D., & Reynolds, P. H. (1997) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/97tc02285 · Cited by 108
Self-citationAn Overview of Grenville Province Geology, Canadian Shield
Davidson, A. (1998) · Geology of the Precambrian Superior and Grenville Provinces and Precambrian Fossils in North America · doi:10.1130/dnag-gna-c1.205 · Cited by 50
The Grenville Province: revisiting the orogenic framework and integrating recent findings
Indares, A. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2023-0143 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Corrigan, D., Culshaw, N. G., & Mortensen, J. K.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 583-596
- ISSN
- 0008-4077
- 1480-3313
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review