Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recent, tectonically induced, surficial stress-relief structures in the Ottawa–Hull area, Canada

Wallach, Joe, Benn, Keith, Rimando, Roily·1995·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

Contemporary reverse faults, marked by offset boreholes, were identified in two roadcuts, and recently formed pop-ups, which are surficial chevron folds, have been recognized in a quarry in the Ottawa-Hull area of Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Displacement directions of the hanging walls, marked by the offset boreholes, are commonly north-northeast to east-northeast, though one set shows displacement to the northwest. The pop-ups recorded during this investigation show average orientations of 120 and 063°. These are similar to the average trends of 136 and 074° documented in a previous study from a quarry about 20 km away. East-southeast- to southeast-trending pop-ups predominate in the two quarries and are kinematically compatible with most of the offset borehole directions recognized to date in the Ottawa-Hull area. Moreover, the quarry-floor pop-up trends in the Ottawa-Hull area are consistent with those of open field, lake bottom and other quarry-floor pop-ups in an area extending from the Miramichi region of New Brunswick into the east-central U.S.A. The compressional origin of the reverse faults and pop-ups, and the predominant orientations of those structures, are compatible with the current ambient stress field in eastern North America. This implies that both the displaced boreholes and quarry-floor pop-ups are products of that stress field, and, despite their presence in excavations, are tectonic in origin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e95-027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Adams J., 1982, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 19, 1883, 10.1139/e82-167 · DOI
  2. Bell J.S., 1985, Geology, 13, 734, 10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13<734:OBITRM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wallach, J., Benn, K., & Rimando, R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
1995-03-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
325-333
ISSN
  • 0008-4077
  • 1480-3313
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review