The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent, tectonically induced, surficial stress-relief structures in the Ottawa–Hull area, Canada
Abstract
Contemporary reverse faults, marked by offset boreholes, were identified in two roadcuts, and recently formed pop-ups, which are surficial chevron folds, have been recognized in a quarry in the Ottawa-Hull area of Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Displacement directions of the hanging walls, marked by the offset boreholes, are commonly north-northeast to east-northeast, though one set shows displacement to the northwest. The pop-ups recorded during this investigation show average orientations of 120 and 063°. These are similar to the average trends of 136 and 074° documented in a previous study from a quarry about 20 km away. East-southeast- to southeast-trending pop-ups predominate in the two quarries and are kinematically compatible with most of the offset borehole directions recognized to date in the Ottawa-Hull area. Moreover, the quarry-floor pop-up trends in the Ottawa-Hull area are consistent with those of open field, lake bottom and other quarry-floor pop-ups in an area extending from the Miramichi region of New Brunswick into the east-central U.S.A. The compressional origin of the reverse faults and pop-ups, and the predominant orientations of those structures, are compatible with the current ambient stress field in eastern North America. This implies that both the displaced boreholes and quarry-floor pop-ups are products of that stress field, and, despite their presence in excavations, are tectonic in origin.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The band of seismicity in the western Quebec seismic zone is linked to the present-day stress regime which reactivated Pre-Tertiary structures, mainly in a reverse kinematic sense with a minor strike-slip component.
“The band of seismicity in the WQSZ is linked to the present-day stress regime which reactivated the Pre-Tertiary structures, mainly in a reverse kinematic sense with a minor strike-slip component (Figure 1, 2) (Wallach et al. 1995, Rimando and Benn 2005, Rimando and Peace 2021).”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Wallach et al. 1995
There is an ongoing debate regarding the causes of Quaternary faulting: whether active deformation is due to glacial isostatic adjustment, tectonic stress-related deformation, or a combination of these two mechanisms.
“Additionally, there is an ongoing debate regarding the causes of Quaternary faulting, revolving around whether active deformation is due to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), tectonic stress-related deformation, or some combination of these two mechanisms (Adams 1989, Wallach et al. 1995).”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Wallach et al. 1995
The OBG fault zone is an aulacogen with vertically dominated slip and a poorly constrained lateral component.
“The OBG fault zone is an aulacogen with vertically dominated slip and a poorly constrained lateral component”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Wallach et al. 1995
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gusti, U. K., Peace, A. L., & Rimando, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0137 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallach, J., Benn, K., & Rimando, R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-333
- ISSN
- 0008-4077
- 1480-3313
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review