Cited by 341Fish Ecology and Management StudiesHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish biology, ecology, and behavior

Floodplain rearing of juvenile chinook salmon: evidence of enhanced growth and survival

Sommer, T R, Nobriga, M L, Harrell, W C, Batham, W, Kimmerer, W J·2001·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

In this study, we provide evidence that the Yolo Bypass, the primary floodplain of the lower Sacramento River (California, U.S.A.), provides better rearing and migration habitat for juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) than adjacent river channels. During 1998 and 1999, salmon increased in size substantially faster in the seasonally inundated agricultural floodplain than in the river, suggesting better growth rates. Similarly, coded-wire-tagged juveniles released in the floodplain were significantly larger at recapture and had higher apparent growth rates than those concurrently released in the river. Improved growth rates in the floodplain were in part a result of significantly higher prey consumption, reflecting greater availability of drift invertebrates. Bioenergetic modeling suggested that feeding success was greater in the floodplain than in the river, despite increased metabolic costs of rearing in the significantly warmer floodplain. Survival indices for coded-wire-tagged groups were somewhat higher for those released in the floodplain than for those released in the river, but the differences were not statistically significant. Growth, survival, feeding success, and prey availability were higher in 1998 than in 1999, a year in which flow was more moderate, indicating that hydrology affects the quality of floodplain rearing habitat. These findings support the predictions of the flood pulse concept and provide new insight into the importance of the floodpl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f00-245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • River discharge is important in creating ephemeral flooded habitats that moderate higher water temperatures, especially at sites with reduced connectivity to the mainstem channel.

    “River discharge is important in creating ephemeral flooded habitats [66,70] that moderate higher water temperatures, especially at sites with reduced connectivity to the mainstem channel.”
  • These high energy prey can help mitigate higher metabolic rates due to elevated water temperatures.

    “which can help mitigate higher metabolic rates due to elevated water temperatures [66,67]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommer, T. R., Nobriga, M. L., Harrell, W. C., Batham, W., & Kimmerer, W. J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
325-333
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2170930265
Cited by
341
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, floodplain habitats, Yolo Bypass, juvenile growth rate, juvenile survival, prey availability, feeding success, bioenergetics, Sacramento River

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review