Hierarchical interpretation of nonlinear relationships linking yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) distribution to the environment in the Atlantic Ocean
Abstract
Using generalized additive models, we show evidence for nonlinear relationships between various hydrological factors and age-structured catch per unit effort of Atlantic yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) for two fishing fleets. Catchability effects are distinguished from tuna environmental preference effects in the catch per unit effort variability. With respect to catchability, an important nonlinear effect of local fishing effort is highlighted for each fleet. It is interpreted as resulting from a local overfishing phenomenon of adult yellowfin tuna and from vessel fishing tactics (cooperation/spying). The environmental preferences obtained facilitate the interpretation of the hierarchical spatial distribution and age-dependent movements of the yellowfin population. We show that, on a large spatiotemporal scale (the whole ocean), low salinity is a good predictor of yellowfin habitat. Juveniles are mainly distributed in low-salinity waters (<0.035 kg·kg1) when adults extend their range to waters of 0.036 kg·kg1. On a mesoscale, adult population annual reproductive transatlantic displacements are probably driven by temperature and salinity gradients to warm and low-salinity locations that are favorable for juveniles. Northsouth seasonal movements of the population are clearly related to warmwater seasonal oscillations. On a small scale, ocean thermic stability and gradients of sea surface temperature are important physical factors determining yellowfin concentration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GAMs have been previously used to study habitat preferences of many tuna species using fishery data, larval survey data, and electronic tagging data.
“GAMs have been previously used to study habitat preferences of many tuna species using fishery data (Lan et al., 2013;Maury et al., 2001;Mugo et al., 2010;Sagarminaga and Arrizabalaga 2010), larval survey data (Rooker et al., 2013) as well as electronic tagging data (Hazen et al., 2013).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001
Salinity can influence large-scale spatial distribution of tunas.
“Salinity can influence large scale spatial distribution (e.g.Fromentin et al., 2014;Maury et al., 2001;Reygondeau et al., 2012).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001
Maury et al. (2001) suggested that low salinities could indicate favourable trophic areas induced by fluvial water supplies.
“Maury et al. (2001) suggested that low salinities could indicate favourable trophic areas induced by fluvial water supplies.”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001
The importance of salinity for tuna distribution remains controversial in the literature.
“The importance of salinity for tuna distribution remains controversial in the literature, with some suggesting it is not important in influencing oceanic distribution (Sund et al., 1981), while others have found it to be influential (e.g.Bernal et al., 2009;Maury et al., 2001;Reygondeau et al., 2012).”
From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001
Cites
El Niño Southern Oscillation and tuna in the western Pacific
Lehodey, P., Bertignac, M., Hampton, J., Lewis, A., & Picaut, J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/39575 · Cited by 494 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Environmental factors are known to be responsible for fish movements, at least on a large spatial scale (Mendels sohn and Roy 1986; Marsac 1992; Lehodey et al. 1997).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna
Arrizabalaga, H., Dufour, F., Kell, L., Merino, G., Ibaibarriaga, L., Chust, G., Irigoien, X., Santiago, J., Murua, H., Fraile, I., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.07.001 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Association between bluefin tuna schools and oceanic features in the western Mediterranean
Royer, F., Fromentin, J., & Gaspar, P. (2004) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps269249 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Bioenergetics, Trophic Ecology, and Niche Separation of Tunas
(2016) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.amb.2016.06.002 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maury, O., Gascuel, D., Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A., & Rosa, A.-L. D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 458-469
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2096307848
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Keywords
- yellowfin tuna, catch per unit effort, catchability, environmental preferences, salinity, sea surface temperature, nonlinear relationship, overfishing, fishing effort, seasonal movement, Atlantic Ocean, habitat use, juvenile distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review