Cited by 61Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Hierarchical interpretation of nonlinear relationships linking yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) distribution to the environment in the Atlantic Ocean

Maury, Olivier, Gascuel, Didier, Marsac, Francis, Fonteneau, Alain, Rosa, Anne-Laure De·2001·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Using generalized additive models, we show evidence for nonlinear relationships between various hydrological factors and age-structured catch per unit effort of Atlantic yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) for two fishing fleets. Catchability effects are distinguished from tuna environmental preference effects in the catch per unit effort variability. With respect to catchability, an important nonlinear effect of local fishing effort is highlighted for each fleet. It is interpreted as resulting from a local overfishing phenomenon of adult yellowfin tuna and from vessel fishing tactics (cooperation/spying). The environmental preferences obtained facilitate the interpretation of the hierarchical spatial distribution and age-dependent movements of the yellowfin population. We show that, on a large spatiotemporal scale (the whole ocean), low salinity is a good predictor of yellowfin habitat. Juveniles are mainly distributed in low-salinity waters (<0.035 kg·kg–1) when adults extend their range to waters of 0.036 kg·kg–1. On a mesoscale, adult population annual reproductive transatlantic displacements are probably driven by temperature and salinity gradients to warm and low-salinity locations that are favorable for juveniles. North–south seasonal movements of the population are clearly related to warmwater seasonal oscillations. On a small scale, ocean thermic stability and gradients of sea surface temperature are important physical factors determining yellowfin concentration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f00-261

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GAMs have been previously used to study habitat preferences of many tuna species using fishery data, larval survey data, and electronic tagging data.

    “GAMs have been previously used to study habitat preferences of many tuna species using fishery data (Lan et al., 2013;Maury et al., 2001;Mugo et al., 2010;Sagarminaga and Arrizabalaga 2010), larval survey data (Rooker et al., 2013) as well as electronic tagging data (Hazen et al., 2013).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001

  • Salinity can influence large-scale spatial distribution of tunas.

    “Salinity can influence large scale spatial distribution (e.g.Fromentin et al., 2014;Maury et al., 2001;Reygondeau et al., 2012).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001

  • Maury et al. (2001) suggested that low salinities could indicate favourable trophic areas induced by fluvial water supplies.

    “Maury et al. (2001) suggested that low salinities could indicate favourable trophic areas induced by fluvial water supplies.”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001

  • The importance of salinity for tuna distribution remains controversial in the literature.

    “The importance of salinity for tuna distribution remains controversial in the literature, with some suggesting it is not important in influencing oceanic distribution (Sund et al., 1981), while others have found it to be influential (e.g.Bernal et al., 2009;Maury et al., 2001;Reygondeau et al., 2012).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Maury et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maury, O., Gascuel, D., Marsac, F., Fonteneau, A., & Rosa, A.-L. D.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
458-469
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2096307848
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
yellowfin tuna, catch per unit effort, catchability, environmental preferences, salinity, sea surface temperature, nonlinear relationship, overfishing, fishing effort, seasonal movement, Atlantic Ocean, habitat use, juvenile distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review