Cited by 36Genetic diversity and population structureMarine and fisheries researchForensic and Genetic Research

Genetic analysis reveals two stocks of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the northwestern Indian Ocean

Dammannagoda, Sudath T., Hurwood, David A., Mather, Peter B.·2011·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Skipjack (SJT) ( Katsuwonus pelamis ) is a medium-sized, pelagic, highly dispersive tuna species that occurs widely across tropical and subtropical waters. SJT constitute the largest tuna fishery in the Indian Ocean and are currently managed as a single stock. Patterns of genetic variation in a mtDNA gene and six microsatellite loci were examined to test for stock structure in the northwestern Indian Ocean. 324 individuals were sampled from five major fishing grounds around Sri Lanka and from single sites in the Maldive Islands and the Laccadive Islands. Phylogenetic reconstruction of mtDNA revealed two coexisting divergent clades in the region. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of mtDNA data revealed significant genetic differentiation among sites (ΦST = 0.2029, P < 0.0001), also supported by spatial AMOVA results. AMOVA of microsatellite data also showed significant differentiation among most sampled sites (FST = 0.0256, P < 0.001), consistent with the mtDNA pattern. STRUCTURE analysis of the microsatellite data revealed two differentiated stocks. While both marker types examined identified two genetic groups, microsatellite analysis indicates that the sampled SJT are likely to represent individuals sourced from discrete breeding grounds that are mixed in feeding grounds in Sri Lankan waters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f10-136

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Dammannagoda, S. T., Hurwood, D. A., & Mather, P. B.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2011-02
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
210-223
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W25167579
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
skipjack tuna, stock structure, genetic differentiation, mitochondrial DNA, microsatellite markers, northwestern Indian Ocean, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Laccadive Islands, breeding sites, feeding grounds, population genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review