The Intrusion of Fine Sediments into a Stable Gravel Bed
Abstract
A rectangular flume was used to study variables affecting the intrusion of fine sands into a stable gravel streambed. The amount of intrusion by sand (median particle diameter 0.5 mm) was determined under varied conditions of discharge, depth, velocity, flume slope, and rates of sediment transport. During all experimental tests, sand particles were trapped in voids within the upper 10 cm of an initially clean gravel bed (median particle diameter 15 mm), forming a barrier to further intrusion. An analysis of flow variables showed that flow conditions, as indexed by Froude number, significantly (90% confidence level) affected intrusion amounts, possibly by influencing the rate and depth of formation of the sand seal. Intrusion amounts, expressed as a percent of total volume, varied from 2 to 8%. Two replications used a finer grade sand (median particle diameter 0.2 mm) that intruded more and, in one case, completely filled the gravel pore space (25% by volume), further indicating that particle size, and not hydraulic variables, may have a more important influence on the total amount of intrusion. Key words: sediment transport, intrusion, streambed, substrates, riffles, sedimentation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fines can fill gravel interstices even when streambeds stay stable.
“Even where streambeds remain stable, the intrusion of fines can effectively fill gravel interstices (Beschta and Jackson, 1979).”
From River channel dynamics following extirpation of wolves in northwestern Yellowstone National Park, USA (2006) · cites this paper as Beschta and Jackson, 1979
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goode, J. R., Luce, C. H., & Buffington, J. M. (2012) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.021 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2006) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1362 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationNaiman, R. J., Elliott, S. R., Helfield, J. M., & O'Keefe, T. C. (1999) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/a:1003768102188 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Consecutive wildfires affect stream biota in cold- and warmwater dryland river networks
Whitney, J. E., Gido, K. B., Pilger, T. J., Propst, D. L., & Turner, T. F. (2015) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/683391 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Beschta, R. L., & Jackson, W. L.
- ORCID
- Beschta, Robert L.
- Venue
- Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1979-02-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-210
- ISSN
- 0015-296X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978510595
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- gravel bed, sediment transport, Froude number, particle size, streambed substrate, riffles, sedimentation, flume experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review