Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Insect Community Structure as an Index of Heavy-Metal Pollution in Lotic Ecosystems

Winner, R. W., Boesel, M. W., Farrell, M. P.·1980·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Data from two streams suggest that macroinvertebrate community structure exhibits a predictable, graded response to heavy-metal pollution. In the more heavily stressed sections of both streams, macroinvertebrates, other than tubificid worms and chironomids, were virtually eliminated from rock-rubble, riffle habitats. Midge larvae comprised 75 to 86% of all insects collected from the most grossly polluted stations and less than 10% of the insect communities at the least polluted stations. The correlation coefficient for percentage of chironomids in relation to copper concentration was +0.93 (P ≤ 0.01). Changes in the coefficient of variation (CV) of percentage of chironomids per sample exhibited a consistent pattern. The lowest CV was at the most polluted stations and the CV increased along a gradient of decreasing metal concentrations, reaching maximum values at the least polluted stations. The number of species of chironomids was inversely related to the proportional density of the family in samples. In Elam's Run, the number of species of chironomids identified in samples increased from 15 at the most polluted station to 39 at the least polluted stations. Fifty-seven species of midges were collected along the 3-km stretch of this grossly polluted stream. Caddisflies were numerically important at the intermediately polluted stations in both streams. Mayflies occurred only at the least polluted stations. We hypothesize that heavily polluted habitats are dominated by midges, moderately polluted habitats by midges and caddisflies, and minimally polluted or unpolluted habitats by caddisflies and mayflies. Since there appears to be a direct relationship between the fraction of a community composed of chironomids and the degree of pollution, we suggest that the percentage of chironomids in samples may be a useful index of heavy-metal pollution.Key words: heavy metals, stream pollution, chironomids, aquatic insects

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f80-081

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Winner, R. W., Boesel, M. W., & Farrell, M. P.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
1980-04-01
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
647-655
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2021865172
Cited by
274
References
0
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect Community Structure as an Index of Heavy-Metal Pollution in Lotic Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f80-081
The paper
Winner, R. W., Boesel, M. W., & Farrell, M. P. (1980). Insect Community Structure as an Index of Heavy-Metal Pollution in Lotic Ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.