Fisheries Management Sciences: a plea for conceptual change
Abstract
Recent fishery failures, combined with changing views on management, point to the critical and urgent need for a new approach to fisheries management. Future management should focus on integrated fisheries, rather than solely on fish populations, and will require an appropriate combination of biological considerations with operational, social, and economic considerations of the fishery. This requires development of both a conceptual framework and an appropriate methodology for interdisciplinary decision making in fisheries management. We propose integration of the traditional fields of fisheries science and management with the scientific approach of management science to form Fisheries Management Science. Fisheries management science provides the framework and methodologies for defining multiple objectives and constraints, modelling alternative management scenarios, and assessing and managing risk. This framework accepts diverse information sources toward anticipatory decision making and consensus building, and offers a new paradigm within which effective fisheries management can emerge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been calls for reinventing fisheries management and a push for fisheries science to adopt an ecosystem-based approach.
“There have been clarion calls for “reinventing fisheries management” (Pitcher et al., 1998;Stephenson & Lane, 1995) and a push for fisheries science to adopt an ecosystem-based approach (Holling, 2001;Jackson et al., 2001).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Stephenson & Lane, 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“There have been clarion calls for “reinventing fisheries management” (Pitcher et al., 1998; Stephenson & Lane, 1995) and a push for fisheries science to adopt an ecosystem-based approach (Holling, 2001; Jackson et al., 2001).”
BackgroundCaddy, J. F., & Cochrane, K. L. (2001) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/s0964-5691(01)00074-6 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stephenson, R. L., & Lane, D. E.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2051-2056
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W1963991877
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies
- Keywords
- integrated fisheries management, management science, interdisciplinary decision-making, conceptual framework, multiple objectives, risk assessment, management scenarios, consensus building, anticipatory decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review