Cited by 157Marine and fisheries researchCoastal and Marine ManagementFish Ecology and Management Studies

A review of fisheries management past and present and some future perspectives for the third millennium

Caddy, J.F., Cochrane, K.L.·2001·Ocean & Coastal Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0964-5691(01)00074-6

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caddy, J. F., & Cochrane, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
Corresponding author
Cochrane, K.L.
Venue
Ocean & Coastal Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001
Volume
44
Issue
9-10
Pages
653-682
ISSN
0964-5691 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080064678
Cited by
157
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ocean & Coastal Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
fisheries management, history of fisheries management, fish stock assessment, fisheries control, fisheries monitoring, future perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review