The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperaggregation of fish and fisheries: how catch-per-unit-effort increased as the northern cod (Gadus morhua) declined
Abstract
Misinterpretations of elevated catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) in the northern cod (Gadus morhua) fishery contributed to overestimations of stock size, inflated quotas, and unsustainable fishing mortality in the 1980s and early 1990s. We hypothesize that concentration of the fish and fishery led to extreme hyperstability in the CPUE-abundance relationship. In the late 1980s, migrant cod began to concentrate within the Bonavista corridor, their most southerly cross-shelf migration route. By the spring of 1990, approximately 450 000 t was concentrated within 7000 km 2 at densities quadruple those of the 1980s. Densities remained high through 1992, while abundance declined fivefold. During this period, cod hyperaggregated (local densities increased with decreasing biomass) in the Bonavista corridor and CPUE increased. To the north, no hyperaggregation occurred, and densities and CPUE declined with biomass. In the Bonavista corridor from 1990 to 1993, CPUE was hyperstable with local cod density. Areas of high cod densities (>0.1 fish·m-2) shrunk as regional estimates of cod biomass declined. The spatial extent of the fishery contracted proportional to the shrinkage in area occupied by the fish. Hence, CPUE was related to abundance at the local scales of a fishing set (local acoustic density) but not to abundance at regional or stock scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cod spawning on a migration highway in the north-west Atlantic
Rose, G. A. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366458a0 · Cited by 338
Self-citationInteraction Between Stock Area, Stock Abundance, and Catchability Coefficient
Winters, G. H., & Wheeler, J. P. (1985) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f85-124 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities
Maunder, M. N., Sibert, J. R., Fonteneau, A., Hampton, J., Kleiber, P., & Harley, S. J. (2006) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.05.008 · Cited by 582
Allee effects driven by predation
GASCOIGNE, J. C., & LIPCIUS, R. N. (2004) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00944.x · Cited by 318
Erisman, B. E., Allen, L. G., Claisse, J. T., Pondella, D. J., Miller, E. F., & Murray, J. H. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f2011-090 · Cited by 304
Incorporating time-varying catchability into population dynamic stock assessment models
Wilberg, M. J., Thorson, J. T., Linton, B. C., & Berkson, J. (2009) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641260903294647 · Cited by 252
Endangering the endangered: The effects of perceived rarity on species exploitation
Hall, R. J., Milner‐Gulland, E. J., & Courchamp, F. (2008) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00013.x · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, G. A., & Kulka, D. W.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1999-11-30
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 118-127
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2123395471
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperaggregation of fish and fisheries: how catch-per-unit-effort increased as the northern cod (Gadus morhua) declined. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f99-207
- The paper
- Rose, G. A., & Kulka, D. W. (1999). Hyperaggregation of fish and fisheries: how catch-per-unit-effort increased as the northern cod (Gadus morhua) declined. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f99-207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.