Cited by 78Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentsIndigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

Indigenous knowledge and federal environmental assessments in Canada: applying past lessons to the 2019 impact assessment act

Open access
Eckert, Lauren E., Claxton, Nick XEMŦOLTW_, Owens, Cameron, Johnston, Anna, Ban, Natalie C., Moola, Faisal, Darimont, Chris T.·2020·FACETS

Abstract

Policy-makers ideally pursue well-informed, socially just means to make environmental decisions. Indigenous peoples have used Indigenous knowledge (IK) to inform decisions about environmental management for millennia. In the last 50 years, many western societies have used environmental assessment (EA) processes to deliberate on industrial proposals, informed by scientific information. Recently EA processes have attempted to incorporate IK in some countries and regions, but practitioners and scholars have criticized the ability of EA to meaningfully engage IK. Here we consider these tensions in Canada, a country with economic focus on resource extraction and unresolved government-to-government relationships with Indigenous Nations. In 2019, the Canadian government passed the Impact Assessment Act, reinvigorating dialogue on the relationship between IK and EA. Addressing this opportunity, we examined obstacles between IK and EA via a systematic literature review, and qualitative analyses of publications and the Act itself. Our results and synthesis identify obstacles preventing the Act from meaningfully engaging IK, some of which are surmountable (e.g., failures to engage best practices, financial limitations), whereas others are substantial (e.g., knowledge incompatibilities, effects of colonization). Finally, we offer recommendations for practitioners and scholars towards ameliorating relationships between IK and EA towards improved decision-making and recognition of Indigeno…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/facets-2019-0039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delineating what Indigenous knowledge is and how it operates has remained largely the purview of external organizations, governments, institutions and researchers rather than by Indigenous peoples themselves.

    “However, delineating what Indigenous knowledge is and how it operates has remained largely the purview of external organizations, governments, institutions and researchers rather than by Indigenous peoples them/ourselves (Battiste & Henderson, 2000; Eckert et al., 2020; McGregor, 2004a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eckert, L. E., Claxton, N. X., Owens, C., Johnston, A., Ban, N. C., Moola, F., & Darimont, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • School of Child and Youth Care, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
  • West Coast Environmental Law, 201-2006 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V6J 2B3, Canada
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Venue
FACETS
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
67-90
ISSN
2371-1671 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006331155
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • FACETS (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
indigenous knowledge, environmental assessment, federal environmental policy, Indigenous engagement, resource extraction, indigenous rights, colonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review