The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Tsn1–ToxA interaction in the wheat–Stagonospora nodorum pathosystem parallels that of the wheat–tan spot system
Abstract
The wheat tan spot fungus ( Pyrenophora tritici-repentis ) produces a well-characterized host-selective toxin (HST) known as Ptr ToxA, which induces necrosis in genotypes that harbor the Tsn1 gene on chromosome 5B. In previous work, we showed that the Stagonospora nodorum isolate Sn2000 produces at least 2 HSTs (SnTox1 and SnToxA). Sensitivity to SnTox1 is governed by the Snn1 gene on chromosome 1B in wheat. SnToxA is encoded by a gene with a high degree of similarity to the Ptr ToxA gene. Here, we evaluate toxin sensitivity and resistance to S. nodorum blotch (SNB) caused by Sn2000 in a recombinant inbred population that does not segregate for Snn1. Sensitivity to the Sn2000 toxin preparation cosegregated with sensitivity to Ptr ToxA at the Tsn1 locus. Tsn1-disrupted mutants were insensitive to both Ptr ToxA and SnToxA, suggesting that the 2 toxins are functionally similar, because they recognize the same locus in the host to induce necrosis. The locus harboring the tsn1 allele underlies a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) for resistance to SNB caused by Sn2000, and explains 62% of the phenotypic variation, indicating that the toxin is an important virulence factor for this fungus. The Tsn1 locus and several minor QTLs together explained 77% of the phenotypic variation. Therefore, the Tsn1–ToxA interaction in the wheat–S. nodorum pathosystem parallels that of the wheat–tan spot system, and the wheat Tsn1 gene serves as a major determinant for susceptibility to both SNB and tan spot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thirty years of resistance: Zig-zag through the plant immune system
Ngou, B. P. M., Ding, P., & Jones, J. D. G. (2022) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac041 · Cited by 961
Faris, J. D., Zhang, Z., Lu, H., Lu, S., Reddy, L., Cloutier, S., Fellers, J. P., Meinhardt, S. W., Rasmussen, J. B., Xu, S. S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004090107 · Cited by 542
Self-citationWhen and how to kill a plant cell: Infection strategies of plant pathogenic fungi
Horbach, R., Navarro-Quesada, A. R., Knogge, W., & Deising, H. B. (2011) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.014 · Cited by 440
Evolution and genome architecture in fungal plant pathogens
Möller, M., & Stukenbrock, E. H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.76 · Cited by 432
Host-specific toxins: effectors of necrotrophic pathogenicity
Friesen, T. L., Faris, J. D., Solomon, P. S., & Oliver, R. P. (2008) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01153.x · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., Friesen, T. L., Ling, H., Meinhardt, S. W., Oliver, R. P., Rasmussen, J. B., & Faris, J. D.
- Venue
- Genome
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1265-1273
- ISSN
- 0831-2796 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3321
- OpenAlex
- W2128399290
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tsn1–ToxA interaction in the wheat–Stagonospora nodorum pathosystem parallels that of the wheat–tan spot system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/g06-088
- The paper
- Liu, Z., Friesen, T. L., Ling, H., Meinhardt, S. W., Oliver, R. P., Rasmussen, J. B., & Faris, J. D. (2006). The Tsn1–ToxA interaction in the wheat–Stagonospora nodorum pathosystem parallels that of the wheat–tan spot system. Genome. https://doi.org/10.1139/g06-088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.