The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps
Abstract
Genetic linkage maps based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms are useful for many purposes; however, different populations are required to fulfill different objectives. Clones from the linkage map(s) are subsequently probed onto populations developed for special purposes such as gene tagging. Therefore, clones contained on the initial map(s) must be polymorphic on a wide range of genotypes to have maximum utility. The objectives of this research were to (i) calculate polymorphism information content values of 51 low-copy DNA clones and (ii) use the resulting values to choose potential mapping parents. Polymorphism information content was calculated using gene diversity by classifying restriction fragment patterns on a diverse set of 18 wheat genotypes. Combinations of potential parents were then compared by examining both the proportion of polymorphic clones and the likelihood that those mapped clones would give a polymorphism when used on other populations. Genotype pairs were identified that would map more highly informative DNA clones compared with a population derived from the most polymorphic potential parents. The methodologies used to characterize clones and rank potential parents should be applicable to other species and types of markers as well.Key words: restriction fragment length polymorphism, mapping, Triticum aestivum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thiel, T., Michalek, W., Varshney, R., & Graner, A. (2003) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0 · Cited by 2,535
Cordeiro, G. M., Casu, R., McIntyre, C. L., Manners, J. M., & Henry, R. J. (2001) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(01)00365-x · Cited by 452
Chowdhury, T., Mandal, A., Roy, S. C., & De Sarker, D. (2017) · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.12.004 · Cited by 95
Medium Composition Affects the Tissue Culture-Induced Variation in Triticale Regenerants
Pachota, K. A., Orłowska, R., & Bednarek, P. T. (2022) · Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-022-02327-z · Cited by 15
Fundamental Methods in Molecular Biology
Ijaz, S., & Hassan, S. (2026) · Molecular Biology Methods · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-2642-9_1
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, J. A., Churchill, G. A., Autrique, J. E., Tanksley, S. D., & Sorrells, M. E.
- Venue
- Genome
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1993-02-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-186
- ISSN
- 0831-2796 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3321
- OpenAlex
- W2104043339
- Cited by
- 1,540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.