The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A taxonomic study of the Spirillum lipoferum group, with descriptions of a new genus, Azospirillum gen. nov. and two species, Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinck) comb. nov. and Azospirillum brasilense sp. nov.
Open accessAbstract
Sixty-one strains of the root-associated nitrogen fixer Spirillum lipoferum exhibited a similar morphology in peptone–succinate salts medium: vibrioid cells having a diameter of 1.0 μm. When grown in broth the cells had a single polar flagellum, but when grown on agar at 30 °C lateral flagella of shorter wavelength were also formed. The DNA base composition was 69–71 mol % guanine + cytosine when determined by thermal denaturation. DNA homology experiments indicated the occurrence of two distinct but related homology groups: 46 strains were in group I and 15 strains were in group II. Group II strains were distinguished by their ability to use glucose as a sole carbon source for growth in nitrogen-free medium, by their production of an acidic reaction in a peptone-based glucose medium, by their requirement for biotin, and by their formation of wider, longer, S-shaped or helical cells in semisolid nitrogen-free malate medium. The results indicate that two species exist, and on the basis of their characteristics it is proposed that they be assigned to a new genus, Azospirillum. Strains belonging to group II are named A.lipoferum (Beijerinck) comb, nov., while those belonging to group I are named A.brasilense sp. nov. Strain Sp 59b (ATCC 29707) is proposed as the neotype strain for A. lipoferum, and strain Sp 7 (ATCC 29145) is proposed as the type strain for A. brasilense.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Steenhoudt, O., & Vanderleyden, J. (2000) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00036-x · Cited by 992
Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation
Fukami, J., Cerezini, P., & Hungria, M. (2018) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-018-0608-1 · Cited by 624
Recent advances in BNF with non-legume plants
Baldani, J., Caruso, L., Baldani, V. L. D., Goi, S. R., & Döbereiner, J. (1997) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(96)00218-0 · Cited by 406
Self-citationInfection and Colonization of Sugar Cane and Other Graminaceous Plants by Endophytic Diazotrophs
James, E. K. (1998) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0735-2689(98)00357-8 · Cited by 375
Regulation cascade of flagellar expression in Gram-negative bacteria
Soutourina, O. A., & Bertin, P. N. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00064-0 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarrand, J. J., Krieg, N. R., & Döbereiner, J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1978-08-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 967-980
- ISSN
- 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3275
- OpenAlex
- W2031073745
- Cited by
- 825
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A taxonomic study of the Spirillum lipoferum group, with descriptions of a new genus, Azospirillum gen. nov. and two species, Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinck) comb. nov. and Azospirillum brasilense sp. nov. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/m78-160
- The paper
- Tarrand, J. J., Krieg, N. R., & Döbereiner, J. (1978). A taxonomic study of the Spirillum lipoferum group, with descriptions of a new genus, Azospirillum gen. nov. and two species, Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinck) comb. nov. and Azospirillum brasilense sp. nov. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1139/m78-160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.