The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infection and Colonization of Sugar Cane and Other Graminaceous Plants by Endophytic Diazotrophs
Abstract
Agriculturally important grasses such as sugar cane (Saccharum sp.), rice (Oryza sativa), wheat (Triticum aestivum) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), maize (Zea mays), Panicum maximum, Brachiaria spp., and Pennisetum purpureum contain numerous diazotrophic bacteria, such as, Acetobacter diazotrophicus, Herbaspirillum spp., Azospirillum spp. These bacteria do not usually cause disease symptoms in the plants with which they are associated and the more numerous of them, for example, Herbaspirillum spp. and A. diazotrophicus, are obligate or facultative endo-phytes that do not survive well (or at all) in native soil; these are thought to be spread from plant generation to plant generation via seeds, vegetative propagation, dead plant material, and possibly by insect sap feeders. By contrast, Azospirillum spp. are not wholly endophytic but are root-associated, soil-dwelling bacteria that are also often found within plants, probably entering host plants via seeds or via wounds/cracks at lateral root junctions. Endophytic diazotrophs have been isolated from a number of grasses in which significant biological N2 fixation (BNF) has been demonstrated, particularly Brazilian sugar cane varieties, but also in rice, maize, and sorghum. However, although the endophytic diazotrophs are held to be the causative agents of the observed BNF, direct evidence for this is lacking. Therefore, in this review we examine probable sites of bacterial multiplication and/or BNF within endophyte-containing grasses and discuss these in terms of potential benefits (or not) to both host plants and bacteria. In particular, we examine how potentially large numbers of bacteria, especially Herbaspirillum spp., A. diazotrophicus, and Azospirillum spp., can exist extracellularly within non-specialized (for symbiotic purposes) regions such as xylem vessels and intercellular spaces. The processes of infection and colonization of various grasses (particularly sugar cane) by diazotrophic endophytes are also described, and these are compared with those of important (nondiazotrophic) endophytic sugar cane pathogens such as Clavibacter xyli subsp. xyli and Xanthomonas albilineans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tarrand, J. J., Krieg, N. R., & Döbereiner, J. (1978) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m78-160 · Cited by 825
A new acid-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane
Cavalcante, V. A., & Dobereiner, J. (1988) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02370096 · Cited by 711
Baldani, J. I., Baldani, V. L. D., Seldin, L., & Döbereiner, J. (1986) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-36-1-86 · Cited by 551
Development of the Legume Root Nodule
Brewin, N. J. (1991) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.001203 · Cited by 501
Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn
McInroy, J. A., & Kloepper, J. W. (1995) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00011472 · Cited by 460
Contribution of Nitrogen Fixation to Sugar Cane: Nitrogen‐15 and Nitrogen‐Balance Estimates
Urquiaga, S. S., Cruz, K. H. S., & Boddey, R. M. (1992) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010017x · Cited by 446
Root colonization and systemic spreading of Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 in grasses
Hurek, T., Reinhold-Hurek, B., Van Montagu, M., & Kellenberger, E. (1994) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.176.7.1913-1923.1994 · Cited by 421
Recent advances in BNF with non-legume plants
Baldani, J., Caruso, L., Baldani, V. L. D., Goi, S. R., & Döbereiner, J. (1997) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(96)00218-0 · Cited by 406
A review of issues related to measuring colonization of plant roots by bacteria
Kloepper, J. W., & Beauchamp, C. J. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m92-202 · Cited by 393
Reconciling the incompatible: N2fixation And O2
Gallon, J. R. (1992) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00087.x · Cited by 380
Cited by
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Turner, T. R., James, E. K., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209 · Cited by 1,349
Self-citationSteenhoudt, O., & Vanderleyden, J. (2000) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00036-x · Cited by 992
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Sato, T., Suzuki, H., Ye, B., Hamada, T., Isawa, T., Mitsui, H., & Minamisawa, K. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.11.5285-5293.2001 · Cited by 470
Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status
Dodd, I. C., Zinovkina, N. Y., Safronova, V. I., & Belimov, A. A. (2010) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00439.x · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- James, E. K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-119
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059014976
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infection and Colonization of Sugar Cane and Other Graminaceous Plants by Endophytic Diazotrophs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-2689(98)00357-8
- The paper
- James, E. K. (1998). Infection and Colonization of Sugar Cane and Other Graminaceous Plants by Endophytic Diazotrophs. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-2689(98)00357-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.