Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inoculum density, temperature, and genotype effects on in vitro growth promotion and epiphytic and endophytic colonization of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings inoculated with a pseudomonad bacterium

Pillay, V. K., Nowak, J.·1997·Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

The effects of inoculum density (0, 4.6 × 10 7, 4.2 × 10 8, and 8.8 × 10 8 cfu∙mL−1), temperature (10, 20, and 30 °C), and plant genotype (cultivars Celebrity, Blazer, Scotia, and Mountain Delight) on bacterial colonization and plant growth promotion were investigated in a gnotobiotic system. An in vitro dual culture of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plantlets and a Pseudomonas sp., strain PsJN, were used. Epiphytic (external) and endophytic (internal) bacterial populations were determined to evaluate plantlet colonization. Shoot and root biomass of bacterized plantlets was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) than that of nonbacterized controls. Growth promotion was best with inoculum densities of 3 × 10 8– 7 × 10 8 cfu∙mL−1 at 20 °C, particularly in the early maturing cultivars Blazer and Scotia. Lower inoculum densities were required to maximize root growth (approximately 1 × 10 8 cfu∙mL−1) than shoot growth (approximately 3 × 10 8 cfu∙mL−1). Shoot surface populations did not vary with inoculum density or temperature, but the bacterium colonized the shoot exterior of cultivars Celebrity, Mountain Delight, and Scotia better than cultivar Blazer. The root surface populations increased linearly with increasing inoculum density (within a range of 10 7–10 8 cfu∙mL−1), decreased with increasing temperatures (from 10 to 30 °C), and were higher for the main season cultivar Celebrity than for cultivars Blazer, Scotia, and Mountain Delight. Populations of shoot endophytes did not vary with initial inoculum density or genotype but were affected by temperature; the highest colonization was at 10 °C. The number of root endophytes was also highest at 10 °C at the inoculum density of approximately 4 × 10 8 cfu∙mL−1 and did not vary with genotypes. The experiments clearly indicate that there was no relationship between root surface colonization and plant growth promotion. However, the range of inoculum levels (3 × 10 8– 7 × 10 8 cfu∙mL−1) that promoted colonization of the inner root tissues (endophytic) also best promoted plant growth. A possible biostimulation threshold within the tissues of the inoculated plants under conditions favourable to the growth of tomato is proposed.Key words: Pseudomonas sp., tomato, colonization, growth promotion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/m97-049

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Pillay, V. K., & Nowak, J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Published
1997-04-01
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
354-361
ISSN
  • 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3275
OpenAlex
W2011712787
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inoculum density, temperature, and genotype effects on in vitro growth promotion and epiphytic and endophytic colonization of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings inoculated with a pseudomonad bacterium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/m97-049
The paper
Pillay, V. K., & Nowak, J. (1997). Inoculum density, temperature, and genotype effects on in vitro growth promotion and epiphytic and endophytic colonization of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings inoculated with a pseudomonad bacterium. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1139/m97-049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.