The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management
Abstract
Bayesian belief and decision networks are modelling techniques that are well suited to adaptive-management applications, but they appear not to have been widely used in adaptive management to date. Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) can serve many purposes, from illustrating a conceptual understanding of system relations to calculating joint probabilities for decision options and predicting outcomes of management policies. We describe the nature and capabilities of BBNs, discuss their applications to the adaptive-management process, and present a case example of adaptive management of forests and terrestrial lichens in north-central British Columbia. We recommend that those unfamiliar with BBNs should begin by first developing influence diagrams with relatively simple structures that represent the system under management. Such basic models can then be elaborated to include more variables, the mathematical relations among them, and features that allow assessment of the utility of alternative management actions or strategies. Users of BBNs should be aware of several important limitations, including problems in representing feedback and time–dynamic functions. Nevertheless, when properly used, Bayesian networks can benefit most adaptive-management teams by promoting a shared understanding of the system being managed and encouraging the rigorous examination of alternative management policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Marcot, B. G., Steventon, J. D., Sutherland, G. D., & McCann, R. K. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x06-135 · Cited by 667
Self-citationBayesian networks in environmental modelling
Aguilera, P. A., Fernández, A., Fernández, R., Rumí, R., & Salmerón, A. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004 · Cited by 666
The Role of Expert Opinion in Environmental Modelling
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011 · Cited by 413
Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management
McCann, R. K., Marcot, B. G., & Ellis, R. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x06-238 · Cited by 381
Self-citationMantyka-Pringle, C. S., Jardine, T. D., Bradford, L., Bharadwaj, L., Kythreotis, A. P., Fresque-Baxter, J., Kelly, E., Somers, G., Doig, L. E., Jones, P. D., et al. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.008 · Cited by 150
“…problems such as the evaluation of alternative management options for natural systems under multiple stressors (Ban et al., 2014; Mantyka-Pringle et al., 2016), in adaptive management (Nyberg et al., 2006), and for representing TK in SK-based ecosystem management (McGregor et al., 2010).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Nyberg, J. B., Marcot, B. G., & Sulyma, R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3104-3116
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2117843969
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x06-108
- The paper
- Nyberg, J. B., Marcot, B. G., & Sulyma, R. (2006). Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.