The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir ecosystem
Abstract
The allocation of biomass and nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) was measured from August 1976 to September 1978 in a young, second-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco) stand in the Oregon Coast Range. Tree biomass comprised 78–79% of the total standing crop of organic matter with the remainder allocated as follows: soil organic matter, 17%; forest floor, 4%; and fungi, 2%. Bole biomass accounted for 64–66% of the total tree standing crop; the remainder was apportioned among: nonmycorrhizal roots, 17–18%; branches, 7–8%; mycorrhizae, 6%; and foliage, 4%. Nutrient stocks in aboveground tree components exceeded those in belowground components by one to nine times. For all nutrients except Ca, roots and mycorrhizae contained larger stocks than either the forest floor or fungi; amounts of Ca in the forest floor and in fungi were twice those in roots and mycorrhizae. Return of organic matter to the soil by fine roots and mycorrhizae ranged from 84 to 78% of total tree return. About 73% of total net primary production was invested in growth and maintenance of roots and mycorrhizae. Return of N, P, and K to the soil by mycorrhizae comprised 83–87% of total tree return and 25–51% of Ca and Mg return. Return by mycorrhizae of N, P, and K was four to five times greater than that of roots, nearly equal for Ca, and three times less for Mg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Read, D. J. (1991) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01972080 · Cited by 1,744
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Substrate flow in the rhizosphere
Lynch, J. M., & Whipps, J. M. (1990) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00011685 · Cited by 1,149
Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests
Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., & Vogt, D. J. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60122-1 · Cited by 962
Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., Palmiotto, P. A., Boon, P., O'Hara, J., & Asbjornsen, H. (1995) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00017088 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Fogel, R., & Hunt, G.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1983-04-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-232
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W1973460203
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x83-031
- The paper
- Fogel, R., & Hunt, G. (1983). Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x83-031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.