The vegetation of postlogged black spruce lowlands in central Canada. I. Trees and tall shrubs
Abstract
A total of 122 lowland, postlogged stands in northeastern Ontario, Canada, previously dominated by Piceamariana (Mill.) B.S.P., were surveyed for the abundance of woody species to determine the extent of natural P. mariana regeneration. Detailed information on soils, site characteristics, time since disturbance, and the type of logging was included in the survey. Stand ages ranged from 0 to 56 years since logging, and the carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio, used as an index of site nutrient regime, ranged from 16.2 to 60.6. The average density of trees in postlogged stands was far less than in unlogged stands on comparable sites (3050 vs. 42 000–342 000/ha). Among the logged stands, P. mariana density was highest in stands more than 20 years old and on sites with a C/N ratio greater than 40, whereas density was lowest in young stands on sites with a low C/N ratio. On sites with a C/N ratio between 25 and 35, Abiesbalsamea was the most important tree species, whereas broadleaved trees and shrubs dominated sites with a C/N ratio less than 25. In addition, broadleaved species, notably Populustremuloides, P. balsamifera, and Betulapapyrifera, achieved greater annual height growth on the sites with a low C/N ratio than did P. mariana. Twenty years before the survey marked the onset of large-scale mechanical logging. The absence of young stands with a high C/N ratio in the soil indicates that mechanical wheel skidding caused a more drastic site conversion, through disruption of the surface peat, than occurred with the earlier horse skidding practices. Mechanical logging, therefore, places fast-growing species at a competitive advantage over P. mariana by creating microsites for broadleaved seedling establishment and promoting a nutrient-enhanced substrate. These results are discussed in relation to the postfire regeneration of P. mariana and the growth strategy of the species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carleton, T. J., & Maclellan, P. (1994) · Ecoscience · doi:10.1080/11956860.1994.11682238 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationPinto, F. (2003) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc79613-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brumelis, G., & Carleton, T. J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1470-1478
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2048995173
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Keywords
- black spruce, natural regeneration, C/N ratio, balsam fir, Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera, wheel skidding, post-fire regeneration, growth strategy, northeastern Ontario
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review