The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Above- and below-ground biomass and production of lodgepole pine on sites with differing soil moisture regimes
Abstract
The distribution of tree biomass and the allocation of production was measured in four stands of lodgepole pine (Pinuscontorta var. latifolia Engelm.), two growing on sites with xeric soil moisture regimes and two on sites with mesic soil moisture regimes. At the time of sampling the stands were 70–78 years old. Aboveground biomass ranged from 116.5 Mg•ha−1 on one xeric site to 313.1 Mg•ha−1 on one mesic site. Stem biomass represented 68 and 73% of total tree biomass on the xeric and mesic sites, respectively. Total root biomass represented between 20 and 28% of total lodgepole pine biomass. Fine and small roots (<5 mm diameter) represented 4 and 1.5% of total tree biomass on the xeric and mesic sites, respectively. Total net primary production ranged from 7.9 Mg•ha−1•year−1 on the xeric sites to 11.9 Mg•ha−1•year−1 on the mesic sites. Stemwood production represented 20 and 27% of total net primary production on the xeric sites and 35% on both mesic sites. Belowground production represented 38 and 46% of total net primary production on the two mesic sites (4.5 and 5.5 Mg•ha−1•year−1, respectively) and 55 and 66% on the two xeric sites (4.3 and 6.3 Mg•ha−1•year−1, respectively). Fine and small roots represented 82–94% of belowground production. Production allocation was in the following order: fine and small roots > stems > foliage > coarse roots > branches, for all but the wettest site, where stem production exceeded fine and small root production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests
Cairns, M. A., Brown, S., Helmer, E. H., & Baumgardner, G. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050201 · Cited by 1,622
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
White, M. A., Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., & Nemani, R. R. (2000) · Earth Interactions · doi:10.1175/1087-3562(2000)004<0003:pasaot>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 846
Algeo, T. J., & Scheckler, S. E. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0195 · Cited by 769
Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., Palmiotto, P. A., Boon, P., O'Hara, J., & Asbjornsen, H. (1995) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00017088 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Comeau, P. G., & Kimmins, J. P.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1989-04-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-454
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2008340453
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Above- and below-ground biomass and production of lodgepole pine on sites with differing soil moisture regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x89-070
- The paper
- Comeau, P. G., & Kimmins, J. P. (1989). Above- and below-ground biomass and production of lodgepole pine on sites with differing soil moisture regimes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x89-070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.