Cited by 90Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesForest ecology and managementForest Management and Policy

A comparison of pre-European settlement (1857) and current (1981-1995) forest composition in central Ontario

Jackson, Scott M, Pinto, Fred, Malcolm, Jay R, Wilson, Edward R·2000·Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

Presettlement forest composition along a 278 km long transect through central Ontario was recreated from Ontario land survey notes (1857) and compared with existing forest composition as derived from Forest Resource Inventories (1981-1995). Trends through time were analyzed by means of detrended correspondence analysis and univariate statistics (paired t tests and Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-ranks tests). Ordinations based on the first tree taxon listed in a stand and on all tree taxa provided similar results. The eastern half of the transect was initially dominated by boreal conifers, whereas the western half supported stands typical of Ontario's Great Lakes - St. Lawrence (GLSL) region. Significant reductions of yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.), balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), and eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis L.) and significant increases of poplar (Populus spp.) and white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) were observed within the boreal half. A significant reduction in eastern white cedar and an increase poplar were observed in the western half. Changes in the boreal region strongly support previous studies conducted over shorter time periods and may be attributed to clear-cut harvesting. The persistence of shade-tolerant hardwoods within the GLSL region can be attributed to the prevalence of small-scale disturbances associated with partial-cut harvesting systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/x99-242

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Industrial logging of conifer stands in Ontario's forests has resulted in widespread regeneration of intolerant hardwoods, despite attempts to establish conifers.

    “For instance, according to Hearndon et al. (1992) and Jackson et al. (2000), industrial logging of conifer stands in Ontario's forests has resulted in widespread regeneration of intolerant hardwoods, despite attempts to establish conifers.”

Cited by

Authors
Jackson, S. M., Pinto, F., Malcolm, J. R., & Wilson, E. R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
605-612
ISSN
  • 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6037
OpenAlex
W2021485024
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
forest composition change, central Ontario, boreal conifers, yellow birch, balsam fir, eastern white cedar, poplar, white birch, forest disturbance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review